Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sat, 12 Jan 2002 15:20:57 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	J=?iso-8859-1?Q?=E9r=F4me-Georges-Michel BENOIT?= <JGMBenoit AT wanadoo DOT fr>
Cc:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: tetex-beta-20001218 available for testing
Message-ID:	<20020112202057.GE21924@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	J=?iso-8859-1?Q?=E9r=F4me-Georges-Michel BENOIT?= <JGMBenoit AT wanadoo DOT fr>,
	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3c3fe1403c61034a AT mel-rta7 DOT wanadoo DOT fr>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3c3fe1403c61034a@mel-rta7.wanadoo.fr>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 08:09:52AM +0200, J=?iso-8859-1?Q?=E9r=F4me-Georges-Michel BENOIT?= wrote:
>>It doesn't seem like this package should be named tetex-beta-20001218.
>>Unless it is a modification of the sources from more than a year
>>ago, it should be renamed to a more recent date.
>
>The orignal name of main source is `tetex-beta-20001218':
>what I mean is that the date does correspond to the date of the source.

Ok. That is all that I was asking.

cgf

- Raw text -