Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<024601c1995d$304b3d10$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<3C3C8A0E DOT 9000100 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020109183309 DOT GB6261 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)
Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:30:05 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MIMEOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	09 Jan 2002 22:30:06.0501 (UTC) FILETIME=[30559D50:01C1995D]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>


> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:21:02PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >Preliminary versions are here:
> >2) is "rc6" okay for a ${REL} number, or should it be a pure number?
> >(p.s. 'rc' means "robert collins hack" not "release candidate")
>
> upset will do the right thing with it.  I just checked.  It even seems
to
> properly support rc6 vs. rc7.
>
> I don't have any problems with it but it *is* a departure from the
> guidelines in http://cygwin.com/setup.html, I believe.
>
> I'll let Robert make the executive decision on this one, I think.

I'd prefer a pure number, but if you think folk will get seriously
confused, then I guess rcx is ok.

In general, I'd prefer that 'flavours' get indicated in the package name
(libtool_devel_rc-xxx-x-src.tar.bz2)

Rob

- Raw text -