Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:29:56 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
Message-ID:	<20011219162956.GE23322@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<5DABF7424840D411BE9600508B6621F803794E7C AT exchukthis02 DOT experian DOT co DOT uk>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5DABF7424840D411BE9600508B6621F803794E7C@exchukthis02.experian.co.uk>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:21:17PM -0000, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
>I have to admit that I thought it was quite confusing too.  Perhaps if it
>said, "This rule also applies to Cygwin itself because Cygwin is also a
>package"?

Now, *that's* confusing.

So the cygwin package should say

@ cygwin
requires: cygwin

?

cgf

- Raw text -