Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
To:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: RFP: texmf
References:	<m3zo50xawc DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org>
	<20011203212637 DOT GA29013 AT redhat DOT com>
	<04d401c17c41$62a89b60$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
	<20011203213454 DOT GB29013 AT redhat DOT com> <3C0C021F DOT CD69CDFA AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Organization:	Jan at Appel
From:	Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org>
Date:	04 Dec 2001 00:02:29 +0100
In-Reply-To:	<3C0C021F.CD69CDFA@ece.gatech.edu> (Charles Wilson's message of "Mon, 03 Dec 2001 17:52:15 -0500")
Message-ID:	<m3elmbykje.fsf@appel.lilypond.org>
Lines:	17
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) Emacs/21.1
MIME-Version:	1.0

Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> writes:

> But, regardless, tetex needs to be rebuilt and I think I remember the
> maintainer stating that it WOULD be rebuilt soon.

Ah, very good!  I must have missed a reply, sorry for the confusion.

That's another reason I've provided these packages now: probably
tetex-beta (more properly called tetex-bin) needs to know about
texmf-base; much easier when a(n experimental) version is available.

Greetings,
Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org

- Raw text -