| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
| Message-ID: | <098801c17241$04acd1c0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> |
| From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
| To: | <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
| References: | <097201c17240$26c4ce30$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011121035809 DOT GF16959 AT redhat DOT com> |
| Subject: | Re: openssh static size. and -ffunction-sections |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:00:11 +1100 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Priority: | 3 |
| X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
| X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 |
| X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 |
| X-OriginalArrivalTime: | 21 Nov 2001 04:00:06.0930 (UTC) FILETIME=[01A7CF20:01C17241] |
---- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 2:58 PM Subject: Re: openssh static size. and -ffunction-sections > On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 02:53:59PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >Just a thought: was the openssl static libraries built > >with -ffunction-sections? > > > >If not, then that may be why the openssh static binaries where so big > >and so I think that -ffunction-sections should be mandatory for > >packagers, unless the libraries sources is one-function-per-file > >structured (which achieves the same thing). > > Does the linker do the "right thing" when functions are in their > own sections? I didn't know that. I thought there was some other > linker switch available for accomplishing that. I recall a thread recently when someone whinged about ld not grabbing single functions, and the answer was: use -ffunction-sections because _by design_ ld grabs whole sections at a time. Mind you I'm no expert on this, just raising the issue... I'll shutup now. Rob
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |