Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:34:10 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Autotools; new versions
Message-ID:	<20010920143410.B5666@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3BAA33FD DOT 9C1B704C AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3BAA33FD.9C1B704C@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.21i

On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:22:53PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Since there are incompatibilities between
>  autoconf-2.13 and autoconf-2.5x
>  automake-1.4  and automake-1.5
>
>and most (cygwin-external) projects have been slow and/or resistant to
>migrate to the newer versions,
>
>and cgf doesn't want to "push the envelope" on autotools from cygwin
>(let other projects migrate FIRST, then we follow)
>
>and libtool/autoconf/automake must all share the same prefix (usr or
>usr/local or...)

Robert suggested that debian has a wrapper that tries to infer which
version of autoconf to run.  

Is this something worth considering?

cgf

- Raw text -