Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	"Gerrit P. Haase" <gp AT familiehaase DOT de>
Organization:	Esse keine toten Tiere
To:	CA List <Cygwin-Apps AT Cygwin DOT Com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2001 21:31:55 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: Mingw and w32api package names.
Reply-to:	cygwin-apps AT Cygwin DOT Com
Message-ID:	<3B9FD44B.3353.AE9D806@localhost>
In-reply-to:	<3B9F8E93.4130F2D2@yahoo.com>
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12cDE)
X-Hops:	1

Earnie Boyd schrieb am 2001-09-12, 12:34:

>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 09:16:40AM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>> >Earnie Boyd wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 11:54:46AM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>> >> > >Shortly I'll be releasing new packages for MinGW and w32api.  The
>> >> > >current file name for MinGW isn't really reflective of the package
>> >> > >name itself.  I would like to use
>> >> > >mingw-runtime-$(VERSION)-$(CYGRELEASE) for the name.  I would also
>> >> > >like to use w32api-$(VERSION)-$(CYGRELEASE) for the w32api package
>> >> > >name.  This is more consistent with the packaging and is more
>> >> > >consistent with the way the packages are distributed by the MinGW
>> >> > >team.  Comments or objections?

I wonder why it is neccessary to 'rename' a package.
There will be two packages in future? Runtime and Devel? 

Gerrit



-- 
=^..^=

- Raw text -