Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:58:44 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	Cygwin-Apps AT Cygwin DOT Com
Subject:	Re: Mingw and w32api package names.
Message-ID:	<20010911115844.B12971@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT Cygwin DOT Com
Mail-Followup-To:	Cygwin-Apps AT Cygwin DOT Com
References:	<3B9E33C6 DOT B8B10989 AT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3B9E33C6.B8B10989@yahoo.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.21i

On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 11:54:46AM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>Shortly I'll be releasing new packages for MinGW and w32api.  The
>current file name for MinGW isn't really reflective of the package name
>itself.  I would like to use mingw-runtime-$(VERSION)-$(CYGRELEASE) for
>the name.  I would also like to use w32api-$(VERSION)-$(CYGRELEASE) for
>the w32api package name.  This is more consistent with the packaging and
>is more consistent with the way the packages are distributed by the
>MinGW team.  Comments or objections?

I'm sure that this it will confuse the current version of setup if you
call this mingw-runtime.  How are you planning on dealing with the
changeover?

cgf

- Raw text -