Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<01bb01c09b4b$5281e1b0$0200a8c0@voyager>
From:	"Trevor Forbes" <trevorforbes AT ozemail DOT com DOT au>
To:	<cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20010219213847 DOT F23112 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: gcc questions prior to -8 release
Date:	Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:12:15 +0930
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

> From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
........
> 2) If we want to stick with -mno-win32 as the default, should gcc
>    include /usr/include/w32api by default?  I really don't think that
>    it should but I don't look forward to submitting changes to
>    the stuff in sources.redhat.com that breaks as a result.

I prefer to stick with -mno-win32 as the default, include
/usr/include/w32api by default and if possible, have an option to be able
remove the w32api inclusion should it be required.


Regards Trevor

- Raw text -