Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 4 Dec 2000 21:14:08 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Removing gcj from gcc release?
Message-ID:	<20001204211408.B30220@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<188CAABFF1C6AD4D946FF2170CD8B7AA6505 AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<188CAABFF1C6AD4D946FF2170CD8B7AA6505@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 01:01:17PM +1100

On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 01:01:17PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>What about putting libgcj in ? Or does it have problems w/ cygwin at the
>moment?

libgcj is not available for cygwin.

cgf

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, 5 December 2000 1:02 PM
>> To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
>> Subject: Removing gcj from gcc release?
>> 
>> 
>> I've now had a couple of requests from people who were 
>> distressed by the
>> fact that gcj was available in the gcc 2.95.2 release but not libgcj.
>> 
>> It seems like a good idea to me to just remove gcj from future gcc
>> releases.  Opinions?

- Raw text -