Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	RE: Removing gcj from gcc release?
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:01:17 +1100
content-class:	urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4368.4
Message-ID:	<188CAABFF1C6AD4D946FF2170CD8B7AA6505@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au>
Thread-Topic:	Removing gcj from gcc release?
Thread-Index:	AcBeXxrqZTaiH/VDRSet6R+VqyG/igAABbhw
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id VAA28687

What about putting libgcj in ? Or does it have problems w/ cygwin at the
moment?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 December 2000 1:02 PM
> To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Removing gcj from gcc release?
> 
> 
> I've now had a couple of requests from people who were 
> distressed by the
> fact that gcj was available in the gcc 2.95.2 release but not libgcj.
> 
> It seems like a good idea to me to just remove gcj from future gcc
> releases.  Opinions?
> 
> cgf
> 

- Raw text -