Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3A1C73C5.DAFD322A@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Wed, 22 Nov 2000 20:32:53 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Texinfo-4.0
References:	<20001122224758 DOT 2391 DOT qmail AT web115 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <20001122175741 DOT A12681 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:
 
> However, I'm willing to be swayed on the issue.  If everyone else agrees
> that changing the default is the right decision, I'll be happy to do it.

I'm in favor of removing -DWIN32 / -DWINNT from the specs file for
normal gcc compiles (they *would* be defined for -mno-cygwin compiles). 
However, the real issue is Red Hat's paying cygwin customers -- how
would *they* react to this change?

--Chuck

- Raw text -