Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 20:42:28 -0400
To:	cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: perl-5.6.0 ready for test! (IMPORTANT READ THIS MESSAGE ON MAINTAINER STATUS!)
Message-ID:	<20000822204228.B770@cygnus.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References:	<8600BF007197944F8DD3906E40CB428005D83C AT itdomain001 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To:	<8600BF007197944F8DD3906E40CB428005D83C@itdomain001.itdomain.net.au>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 10:39:46AM +1000

On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 10:39:46AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>The set of mailing lists sounds almost like a set of FAQ's - maintained
>by one person per FAQ...
>
>Perhaps a set of FAQ's and a matching set of mail alias's 
>ie PERL-CYGWIN FAQ hanging off the existing FAQ at the index, and 
>perl-cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com - goes to the perl maintainer, and they
>/dev/null or update the FAQ as appropriate.
>
>I think separating support for the application issues from the "kernel"
>or portability layer is a very good idea.

Hmm.  I like this!  We could even set up FAQ-O-MATIC on the cygwin web pages.

cgf

- Raw text -