DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 64R5OpSp804716
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 64R5OpSp804716
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=TEZfHHIA
X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D8BB34BA2E1E
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1779859490;
	bh=gEsV8d05aww85HyUShB7UFXBVPX5FWB+8uTv3lEjRrw=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	From;
	b=TEZfHHIAYybkZMDkKfJOZTWBYGnpRZW4v/iZLgp5gQf0VuTAMj1U7xscFHpQjxzaW
	s9kvdDTLPMKtjbiuE9g2dJ9YJsfF/fjxKpGZi3ECxZu87nUQxTKRZW2sKLtujyyA87
	DGMJYgHFKAU92s57dXJOgMQWD4V1rWzlWHM+q0iA=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 6B5684BA2E1A
ARC-Filter:	OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 6B5684BA2E1A
ARC-Seal:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1779859469; cv=none;
	b=t6SB/lH98mqBoKFycJI5goG4cGgTmqhGpFMpbaBjxKxe/4GvjF9/neQjfQP/NBLrTUP2+R2ldHkNV0xPBcSEaRV/Qd84f0s4huifYD7ieG6kVcELN+RUpZPjx1o4Yv5+zXUDA0qVQSlWD/b7If+fF0tGbVIgcrf87grvUdgPQgQ=
ARC-Message-Signature:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1779859469; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=pujmCDEWsWau1wPfxHtjuNruO50SeSgiHskvYmG3m2U=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version:DKIM-Signature;
	b=ttzI3pRWC+tfqbj3ZDhSeaaSEabhwMoD+D/CIOBRGgII7VCjPqjnY/Yls3n8mxK3JRMAv+zLjaenwYbN7SMQgb93kv+Tk2np+YOhWttcXbXIzFhtODCpRFa8RdyYQBJKhYYO5F+eszD/UzyPVmPXzoC7D0/EG/cp96nYiwpYGjE=
ARC-Authentication-Results:	i=1; sourceware.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected)
	header.d=nifty.ne.jp header.i=@nifty.ne.jp header.a=rsa-sha256
	header.s=default-1th84yt82rvi header.b=TQrCLmfG
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6B5684BA2E1A
Date:	Wed, 27 May 2026 14:24:24 +0900
To:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: "Invalid DTS" warnings only in Cygwin version of ffmpeg
Message-Id:	<20260527142424.e92ff4bd432c3cf04fccc611@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To:	<PR3PR09MB4330B3E7A6B9C12D713E2FECB0082@PR3PR09MB4330.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References:	<PR3PR09MB4330B3E7A6B9C12D713E2FECB0082 AT PR3PR09MB4330 DOT eurprd09 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Wed, 27 May 2026 04:26:40 +0000
destal takul wrote:
> Hi. Thank you for looking into this. I had a quick look at the source code change you did to fix the issue.
> Should I assume that every file that has been remuxed using the previous versions of ffmpeg in Cygwin with those warnings is now permanently damaged?

Unfortunately, yes.

> I had noticed minor jerkiness/choppiness while playing such remuxed files, as though frames were being played out of order, which led me to believe those warnings might not have been cosmetic, and ended up digging deeper and realizing other builds of ffmpeg are not affected.

Your observation is correct.

> Also, will you be reporting this to the Fedora ffmpeg package maintainers?

It's under consideration for now.

> I am not quite sure how/why their source code has diverged so far from the official ffmpeg source code that it is introducing issues which do not exist in the official source.

This is because ffmpeg itself contains numerous codecs that are not
patent-royalty-free. For example, royalties of the H.264 codec is
managed by Via Licensing Alliance (Via LA) and MPEG LA.

> At this point I would be more inclined to use the official ffmpeg Windows builds in Cygwin.

I$B!G(Bd be happy if you use the Cygwin ffmpeg package, but of course
it$B!G(Bs your choice.

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -