DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 60MLHGM02304869
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 60MLHGM02304869
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=aRwAlX7i
X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 923D74BC8980
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1769116633;
	bh=mgv0uiEKKMkJgUrsveBXN9HgS+DzAIKJs/NMVDMDBZ8=;
	h=Date:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id:
	List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:
	From:Reply-To:From;
	b=aRwAlX7iVPOGC5QyF0qpYrhC1OdDs7L4gjG8pFiF6Rckvz7aAg/I5WDpG5lORWHnf
	TB6jXTxH7MRHKw1igB0YKdFLImD5Hlo+NKd5Dm9Z3InR7tac99y3Ix7foNNYxSegm5
	VKrhrmEnBu8mU7cSkWcJhEgfdJRlgomX+BvpyerU=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 3D0E14BA9001
ARC-Filter:	OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 3D0E14BA9001
ARC-Seal:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1769116583; cv=none;
	b=fD77YCIcVrbs6nY4fTtPhnEKvtlcpu+EcnFsqz9yIPFinbOHctyoUQ317QyQaPWNMWhZknIatVeATKzmBlUiK8H8LDVd5ymseP+I8S0dAsaqEMKd5VzVc27DOJoAHU0WpE/zHE+qu4eTSQinBPllV0azqSp6xTK8hU7KgPLOW+g=
ARC-Message-Signature:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1769116583; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=y7Z567IMS1Hy9yjuH19puqgCnVDidxQgCzytPwIGhSI=;
	h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version;
	b=yEO27mM+6Pn5ZmW/L5IEpcXSUbns7hSoWFzBGVtDvQDlnUOYfmiRb1cyNj+amO7trlAxnkT+PTUtzcG8/ACNXiv6UtL4j1sQu8uWXR+OqS3yg5n1CeYN+SOS8vwgkn6diPll4UXFPh2G8o20YBGzsujl4OnK2oAbIxqX1m/Nxo0=
ARC-Authentication-Results:	i=1; server2.sourceware.org
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3D0E14BA9001
Date:	Thu, 22 Jan 2026 13:16:20 -0800 (PST)
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSW DOT ab DOT ca>
Message-ID:	<1378376827.694910.1769116580142@connect.xfinity.com>
In-Reply-To:	<7bf7bd13-ecad-4247-818c-31383967188e@SystematicSW.ab.ca>
References:	<226987210 DOT 591128 DOT 1768766440723 AT connect DOT xfinity DOT com>
	<cc290097-2b7c-a067-981d-f0c3b6f5ee85 AT wisemo DOT com>
	<1534416783 DOT 678540 DOT 1769056874631 AT connect DOT xfinity DOT com>
	<1610598307 DOT 678632 DOT 1769057166805 AT connect DOT xfinity DOT com>
	<7bf7bd13-ecad-4247-818c-31383967188e AT SystematicSW DOT ab DOT ca>
Subject:	Re: Log2 seems inefficient
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
Importance:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev83
X-Originating-IP:	::ffff:50.47.202.14
X-Originating-Port:	20302
X-Originating-Client:	open-xchange-appsuite
X-CMAE-Envelope:	MS4xfBR+W3LqKEyB40kDKlLr15awQ3TDuASQu1cbu+uB/hBHdFPPDF6gm0ybTMyBfU2LAeXL6s/Tepd+lqJxR3tj7u+77uYF37b0iZjn+236iTAtjTc6EDMe
	x2/KFG1Yh/Unrug3Rlsa4Z65kvSl4B+YqZhGxOnKCFUHhTK79k2YKtjUV9HYdcEFAvBzH/0FAV0v6RC71SCEqm2hIebh5BGM2ohyKgHO7ZzpJvqqiSDzWgdf
	vDD1OwbDbhntYiTVJkxSDRv3dLEyfLoXbkB4FroV+bA=
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	KENNON J CONRAD via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	KENNON J CONRAD <kennonconrad AT comcast DOT net>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

Thank you Brain!  Your suggestion to #undef log2 worked perfectly for getting the assembly to call log2 instead of log and eliminates the divide and no longer requires the use of xmm7 to hold the constant log(2).

Unfortunately, 100,000,000 log calculations using log2 is taking 0.700 seconds on my i7-4790k vs. 0.583 when using log and dividing by log(2). So the assembly code now looks good but the time for the log calculations is 20% higher.  I also tried cr_log2 and found the time for the loop using that function is 65% higher (likely with better accuracy).  So it seems to turn out that log2 is even more inefficient speedwise than I thought, given that using log2 is even slower than the the seemingly inefficient use of log divided by log(2) in place of log2.  At this point, it seems the best option speedwise for a 64 bit log may be to rescale surrounding code to support direct use of the log function (no divide by log(2) instead of using the log2 function.

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -