| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| DMARC-Filter: | OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 5BGFmbaf4093328 |
| Authentication-Results: | delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com |
| Authentication-Results: | delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com |
| DKIM-Filter: | OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 5BGFmbaf4093328 |
| X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Original-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| DMARC-Filter: | OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 65B844BA2E2D |
| ARC-Filter: | OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 65B844BA2E2D |
| ARC-Seal: | i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1765900098; cv=none; |
| b=SjP36UgJ0xGi9XvyufcAJzQ1giog7cvVsyeKHIoh8+PkuYIyWVCPsh4wkqx65AvG7aAVO3AxhpztzgRmSN9jUJ14RfTLp7Lq6ZFMbLsz4NlGdYJyMPGFL48Qu1MwH3nPw94qTcz5fynNV32jhrUWof7y3kcMtlvHe7V/oxFUmdo= | |
| ARC-Message-Signature: | i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; |
| t=1765900098; c=relaxed/simple; | |
| bh=IKnEZZtzTQQ1GE3PqYNRfx2JuCgvraP1nRF2jq4cRiM=; | |
| h=DKIM-Signature:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version; | |
| b=JCjj2/rcP6Ulj62OboIvoJl5GFNF8OwfLOKXaZUxXSiQrgTCP2YDTQi6euzY0q05yr6opPzugw6WO+UK7kItVlJ+taJpCtOn4NjW9rv5uqZH61L++P1frIY97lLcH3O3LjMda5z80jgIE0Ef28Oi1sPC7dmsMr3a/0PPrwZgM4o= | |
| ARC-Authentication-Results: | i=1; server2.sourceware.org |
| Subject: | Re: Recent testsuite/winsup.api/pthread/cancel2 failure |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| References: | <20251214162637 DOT 1ee05b084788ba073fe94670 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> |
| <20251214163936 DOT 6841fc62145d8f54cfa31fe7 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> | |
| <9d058204-fb3f-43b4-9e32-6adc7af12ff4 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> | |
| Organization: | WiseMo A/S |
| Message-ID: | <77acb030-e983-6841-b475-f360ad90be48@wisemo.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Dec 2025 16:48:09 +0100 |
| X-Mailer: | Epyrus/2.1.3 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: | <9d058204-fb3f-43b4-9e32-6adc7af12ff4@dronecode.org.uk> |
| X-BeenThere: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| X-Mailman-Version: | 2.1.30 |
| List-Id: | General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Unsubscribe: | <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>, |
| <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe> | |
| List-Archive: | <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe: | <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>, |
| <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe> | |
| From: | Jakob Bohm via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| Reply-To: | Jakob Bohm <jb-cygwin AT wisemo DOT com> |
| Errors-To: | cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com |
| Sender: | "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
| X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 5BGFmbaf4093328 |
On 16/12/2025 14:11, Jon Turney via Cygwin wrote: > On 14/12/2025 07:39, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote: >> On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 16:26:37 +0900 >> Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote: >> >>> Recently, I have concerned that testsuite winsup.api/pthread/cancel2 >>> fails >>> consistently. >>> >>> https://github.com/cygwin/cygwin/actions/runs/19926408142/job/57127200619 >>> > > Thanks very much for looking into this! > > I have the vague idea that this problem started showing up (more?) > when the CI VM was upgraded from Windows Server 2022 to Windows Server > 2025, but I guess that's maybe just timings... > >>> >>> I'm not sure why this happens, but it also falis in my local >>> environment. >>> I looked into this issue a bit, and found that access violation happnes >>> in CloseHandle() in _cygtls::remove(). >>> >>> And I am also not sure why at all, cancel2 works if CloseHandle()'s are >>> replaced with NtClose() as follows. > > I think this is just the difference between the two calls: CloseHandle > generates an exception whereas NtClose returns an error code if the > handle is invalid. > Historically, CloseHandle() would simply return FALSE (0) for bad handles. If this changed, it is a regression in Windows itself. Debug/Checked builds of Windows might report the bad handle to the debugger, but the Release/Free builds would not throw an exception, BSOD or other kind of assert(). > Doesn't really explain whats wrong with the handle, though. > Enjoy Jakob -- Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S. https://www.wisemo.com Transformervej 29, 2860 Søborg, Denmark. Direct +45 31 13 16 10 This public discussion message is non-binding and may contain errors. WiseMo - Remote Service Management for PCs, Phones and Embedded -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |