DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 56HGSVRs1145522
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 56HGSVRs1145522
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=GYLrqvD2
X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 65BAF385EC2A
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1752769709;
	bh=EtUDIssqWbFg1oX+RN3kf7omwnhK01Jzb1iJW4iXUgo=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	From;
	b=GYLrqvD2v+yEG2r3fisJ9NtJZuhqSFPmwtMeHa3FjZk6L9Mke2yiGaILKrc7/Gv4H
	y7pg0GCJQVGMkTIW+1+SsFwVFYUtqZvkiPFCj9P4LIFFO4WDCaGkzaTtCt92nO7M4W
	NLbefChvQ/sYYHFEMBgEYEa7SRWCTjUcnaLcSx2w=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 0F60D385E457
ARC-Filter:	OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 0F60D385E457
ARC-Seal:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1752769683; cv=none;
	b=Z0ekbFfeDUK+UWm3LK4ngZP5L1vKeH5CEKMs0/jKjcRTqW4II4MeJ9ijZS3oazbxzsADGE3heLP0oSaQ7W1eWEvCon2sdYAxa6aUHoZcdBmQNL1CkCg2zzqo690HnEbigmASorbV3bB5uHwvPzzgkk9EKz5Efb+r8pNi27wIG9U=
ARC-Message-Signature:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1752769683; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=X3gY8jATObHym8sUGtxlwmvbtKxSVq/D/JE/bxWWWsc=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version:DKIM-Signature;
	b=FNrEVdj08xwQUwo25NvPxc5wiLlwycOCvz3L3fJRr3u8Kr8cTOjZIyEn3993eip0f+5CtGYcJ2uSsqFkav0iinETWo1f15VOiULldfMgkTKiI6/N1l2ZgC77elF+8gLImo3GA2qamJgWZ0IQFBs1SF/F45KnM5uiiuLc+Hr6mq8=
ARC-Authentication-Results:	i=1; server2.sourceware.org
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0F60D385E457
Date:	Fri, 18 Jul 2025 01:28:00 +0900
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Calling system() in multi-threads.
Message-Id:	<20250718012800.45ae0a80ff8bcd286c176baa@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To:	<20250718004446.9ce9f7f208566ded1a676fd5@nifty.ne.jp>
References:	<20250617215411 DOT ebf69d1c18b55191a1b76c01 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<eb7786ee-dc7a-4689-9d17-b842e581d7c7 AT maxrnd DOT com>
	<20250618203127 DOT 71ac180de11230a9a6055185 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<20250716235236 DOT 96055ec145d9a0528b50c357 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<aHfHCqD2xZcdyu7u AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<20250717231421 DOT 56b54f7e96266311101d4c08 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<aHkUldQHKjA-lZrw AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<20250718004446 DOT 9ce9f7f208566ded1a676fd5 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 56HGSVRs1145522

On Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:44:46 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 17:19:49 +0200
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jul 17 23:14, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > > Hi Corinna,
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:36:42 +0200
> > > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > On Jul 16 23:52, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > > Do you have any idea?
> > > > 
> > > > Locking would be super-simple.
> > > > 
> > > > But theoretically it should be possible to use a local child_info_spawn
> > > > variable at this point.  The ch_spawn child_info_spawn instance is not
> > > > copied to the child anyway, so that should be safe.  The same goes for
> > > > posix_spawn() then, btw.
> > > > 
> > > > I checked the sources and I don't see any dependency to ch_spawn
> > > > from a spawning process, in contrast to an exec'ing process.  That
> > > > doesn't mean there is none, just that I didn't find any.
> > > 
> > > Thanks!
> > > As a starting point, I tried tntroducing locking. It almost works
> > > as expected, however, sometimes my STC in my first report is hangs
> > > if N is large e.g. 100. The patch is as attached.
> > > 
> > > What am I missing?
> > 
> > I don't know.  You're perhaps not releasing the lock in all cases.
> > But I would have to debug this just like you ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
> > 
> > Out of curiosity, did you try using a locale child_info_spawn instance
> > instead?  That would be a rather nice solution, but I'm pretty sure
> > there's some other problem lurking in the dark...
> 
> I'm not sure what to do with local child_info_spawn.
> Some of other modules refer to ch_spawn, such as exception.cc and
> pinfo.cc. Also, has_execed* uses ch_spawn. What should we do for that?
> 
> I've just tried simply the following patch, however, this also hangs
> with my STC.
> 
> diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/spawn.cc b/winsup/cygwin/spawn.cc
> index cb58b6eed..56fca6e45 100644
> --- a/winsup/cygwin/spawn.cc
> +++ b/winsup/cygwin/spawn.cc
> @@ -944,6 +944,7 @@ spawnve (int mode, const char *path, const char *const *argv,
>    int ret;
>  
>    syscall_printf ("spawnve (%s, %s, %p)", path, argv[0], envp);
> +  child_info_spawn ch_spawn_local;
>  
>    if (!envp)
>      envp = empty_env;
> @@ -951,7 +952,7 @@ spawnve (int mode, const char *path, const char *const *argv,
>    switch (_P_MODE (mode))
>      {
>      case _P_OVERLAY:
> -      ch_spawn.worker (path, argv, envp, mode);
> +      ch_spawn_local.worker (path, argv, envp, mode);
>        /* Errno should be set by worker.  */
>        ret = -1;
>        break;
> @@ -961,7 +962,7 @@ spawnve (int mode, const char *path, const char *const *argv,
>      case _P_WAIT:
>      case _P_DETACH:
>      case _P_SYSTEM:
> -      ret = ch_spawn.worker (path, argv, envp, mode);
> +      ret = ch_spawn_local.worker (path, argv, envp, mode);
>        break;
>      default:
>        set_errno (EINVAL);

The hang seems to be at acquiring the cygheap_protect lock in child sh.exe.
This lock is aquired only in _cfree() and _cmalloc(), so I am not sure why
cygheap_protect cannot be acquired at this point at all...

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -