DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 56DLtECl3744973
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 56DLtECl3744973
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Zz8z1d5o
X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 603AD385841D
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1752443711;
	bh=TcyPeoMon54UOFffcRwDobDhPY6G7i9RHK0owyQCUqk=;
	h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	From;
	b=Zz8z1d5o5CxHNdTuyHzILhKRnGWre2Q/9W+f1IstEySrRatcRLU4RRPTAavovI1/v
	B0XF090T4n9Sa92Sh7e9vwRVeABDzCMdzZPUNVJH4Y38ZRp4yvNeVSNO+WEuCOB1TC
	uX4VP3yIXtDiZO8u2x6c+K4scq26ofqxabrV8HZg=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 7F6B63858D37
ARC-Filter:	OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 7F6B63858D37
ARC-Seal:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1752443656; cv=none;
	b=WcEzyipP21+hZxbWjytKbYOEU/1jox58UmHG7kbMBZ5GRa6w1FZlEDDGP+dgrO2hPq1bgVijeKy6yPxi05fBwCtQCrgVCUPrThBfY5qbuq/B9LYNPQwN1BzfG0e/Naa1RVdC7IpILuv1IA8Yr/RDk7nElnkt064zE1fu9kYEMio=
ARC-Message-Signature:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1752443656; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=R/abBCdahsrKWJOCwbOrdQdKW2jyh9LCDGZoN2Go+HY=;
	h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:From:Subject:To:DKIM-Signature;
	b=sCHbRJAdy7i5de6HAwD7fz0QbT45x+foxr4fieYI/zV0IDmU0DSpWC/qYceLfzJjuh8hsj35J9prp78FH5S47LIZC02BbYJfCr+aBBDa6N0V5QRzZ514tHNejaC1kFH7Yq6Tcv3V+dWgWJ1YaZePiZTWSFeITHe7jZ7CWivtCK0=
ARC-Authentication-Results:	i=1; server2.sourceware.org
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7F6B63858D37
Message-ID:	<45887d0a-17d3-40ce-bea5-13fdf9081edd@systematicsw.ab.ca>
Date:	Sun, 13 Jul 2025 15:54:13 -0600
MIME-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject:	Re: SLOW ls(1) - cygwin dir lookups with WinNT async requests?
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CA+1jF5rhwmUqe9-gMwDK6FioS13GRkLd0XyxUHeT5=-ycYUpxg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Organization:	Systematic Software
In-Reply-To:	<CA+1jF5rhwmUqe9-gMwDK6FioS13GRkLd0XyxUHeT5=-ycYUpxg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Stat-Signature:	sdsf5uthmojowh1gfxdskkyfyu6j88y9
X-Rspamd-Server:	rspamout07
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id:	B4FBB6000C
X-Session-Marker:	427269616E2E496E676C69734053797374656D6174696353572E61622E6361
X-Session-ID:	U2FsdGVkX1+KdNQ1fG7rM6N56he+Z8StLoXfGHCESiQ=
X-HE-Tag:	1752443654-729164
X-HE-Meta:	U2FsdGVkX1/utDv0ye1q0h5x6MT+ThyMLtgk30B4krz0+zcPOwkJVc3BiCtjnzyIWZsFp6YPQus7+n0HFu+5pY7q1xNAs2kl18BHUa28du2KHtNrCFhHPNi8TPm4FqWapTb8WSTn1YPtC9FDnqmTYukfaeJ0plaKNfT4XliQfQiFHKcBy6DD9P5iYuOW7RgfbC91CtYygScsm+WIeCeHYdAfs8mH6OoMKlqoaLjoqroWj7/SgNuQVSOzKnDfxBHIEsrahYlD39PMdkCXsyBv5H2Sr17vXGflKFKBkmrou4zf+iD3d4sKSYKipYEDFRkpvlKJMR5ms+2T0ZuXDq7PI6XAME1F/W9H
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Brian Inglis via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	brian DOT inglis AT systematicsw DOT ab DOT ca
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 56DLtECl3744973

On 2025-07-12 10:43, Aurélien Couderc via Cygwin wrote:
> Follow up to an old thread,
> Corinna wrote this:
>> Forth, by not trusting Cygwin to do the right thing and adding a lot
>> of unnecessary code for each single ACL, you slow down ls(1) even more
>> on Cygwin, which already gets a beating for being slow.
> 
> Did anyone consider doing the directory lookups piece by piece, as
> async requests?
> Each time read and process a bit of the directory listing, while the
> filesystem requests for the next bits run as Windows async requests?
> That would promote at least parallelism, instead of doing it serially
> like now.

ISTM the assumption is that any directories accessed are already cached by the 
filesystem, whether Linux, Unix, or Windows, so I/O is not required, and even in 
Cygwin's case it only has to return the Windows entries converted to 
dirent/posix_dent in the directory functions (in a 62KB cache buffer holding 100 
entries) for use by coreutils ls(1). Stat and ACL info require additional calls.

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis              Calgary, Alberta, Canada

La perfection est atteinte                   Perfection is achieved
non pas lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à ajouter  not when there is no more to add
mais lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à retrancher  but when there is no more to cut
                                 -- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -