DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 55NINTnk3761360
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 55NINTnk3761360
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=lnaQHBqo
X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9181D383E130
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1750703004;
	bh=XLmgWhoTZ/U1SH451HBmzQxY83bj5dhuAs8L8cA950s=;
	h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	From;
	b=lnaQHBqo9tEK6rfGgLbVyZVMMhyG3HX/kLq3UU4i/dJkBuKJfe+HqkH50QDeLgPqT
	K26ZU1pKxQHk1klHdRdfkHBGT53anu9Wwg68Y0zsbvAKf/hXuINJs1KXwRsYDuz+u+
	9NdvDEgoouaLf52/JK9qekAo+152GydSIW5e3nzo=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 635CC383E52A
ARC-Filter:	OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 635CC383E52A
ARC-Seal:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1750702978; cv=none;
	b=JOeSuorPMzVBSUpuAmw0tG0OLGZHv4dQMG7aQhuGp8Urqyy88TOj3oXR0L5vNflWhDXQAZ8yayA9ibKVoHuwNwAlBgavJA+SyaQfYyuuyhAMoZP/lPUiW68fEZlMlHNnIpisxWK8TZdOJg2vES8FfV9SkprjJ5aj0FiWVjPESx8=
ARC-Message-Signature:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1750702978; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=eAKrWu+KhbILe6aCgRoyBPrt654vJMKxrYLcT/ISCqM=;
	h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To;
	b=UfpXbDyr3pqngzTJU7LZz+c6aNn9TyRZZh18ckw09A1bBoA8fcEESkSfIX6Bc56+CAfx//g3JatFn/liRQSnQnrZQzkP/r5LXVCshCLq9VT33s8mIQMWeixE6zUmcVRg5U7+gp685bBqnRbJf3+ruZf90M1rC7DCt8NB+0UhW3g=
ARC-Authentication-Results:	i=1; server2.sourceware.org
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 635CC383E52A
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1750702977; x=1751307777;
	h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
	:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
	bh=7D/50benrJZh9vt6Wwouq9sVxHZEYxNHE1delJWbRSM=;
	b=kcNFWWAzkE4nJFrksS3US+NrT9E8++p2nODeYcqebfjVVO7HN9KIQFmU1s7GWeqqqX
	j9lE50hxW4C5bFl5AysW4wHbpodZfWXOKIdYCX86FbU7oBeAB7mphu6ibq3ssqUctjg3
	MsT9W8cX+syETvAMk0mLBNOUTybf6zdITeWT/Tr2jEVcAuUHwB+AGl3poVVjOFP+mtwm
	T5rfIxqwV8PwG/uX5m0KXCmoTNj1+z5ZNhFbkSartbcvW7PI4JeeBBCGg775E8cL53V0
	ifDb9rMIlWVYu5Pk2p8SFdP0t28jMXP9uvPTNn0XkM4xavv7RV353R//31JowZH2yBgQ
	cFXw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted:	i=1;
	AJvYcCX/OtMKL5Pju7RSASVWbITHdfgf4HbYF5t2ugcDBYvEbW2Fapj/Qs2O+klILCAs2m6PoZupkO4=@cygwin.com
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOJu0YxAEg0VZsUfYvyY8o4vXvAh0SpOwYrES0iYXOogDxJOkzuXerwZ
	PKOLH7HHalm7p1611HK1er873tE+pqaed/64UWg3EYg1lnhTDArNGGd3+jCTL4MfzpU42b/sPVg
	hkL4QSUOmK82thBP0kTV3xOj8EiYkVO6OnU7N+4Q=
X-Gm-Gg:	ASbGncvYsXtjSjScBqHaAd1YCFYsxbj+Vwn1lhuk5YgnemWF39NGB7rkaOO2Td+5IUE
	buBCWuIZMPOwdDoLG2O2n90hPxJbwq8MMFqnhsLLXZzmy0m+dRavaRUhmszUq7NoYQRahw5uMZk
	hDrH+cEHG6I7JJp3tX+RW3K88puY7sPq2SOEk62+h8a0Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	AGHT+IGSt27Qi9XJszL9xXgTlNBA5t/p71hjx0vPRtOWJHUplX0Y56rfLdayOA3aMq06NXVsPBrPkRxCVCBOyPNCdEI=
X-Received:	by 2002:a05:6402:34c3:b0:605:2da5:8483 with SMTP id
	4fb4d7f45d1cf-60a1cd30f0emr12964252a12.13.1750702976362; Mon, 23 Jun 2025
	11:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<6058889e2ae8c9c827a8d6678f09b3b1741e2fcf DOT 1750413578 DOT git DOT johannes DOT schindelin AT gmx DOT de>
	<CAHnbEGLjsy4MZD+oqjGbd=JrX+q8an3mhT38xndEgjmTpWyOnw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<aFkPUI22HlYnYhZh AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<aFkPUI22HlYnYhZh@calimero.vinschen.de>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jun 2025 20:22:19 +0200
X-Gm-Features:	AX0GCFvbZInMsiV9SiQH_S6hTGZjQLwuq4YxVYfwDkkKZkchfdO3PhUfx8gjUR8
Message-ID:	<CAHnbEG+7T8K50WkDN4=xBA_ir8N3M32=ZGJnYvCFSpH7UquZ=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: symlink_native() bug with case-sensitive file-systems Re: [PATCH]
	symlink_native: allow linking to `..`
To:	cygwin-patches AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Sebastian Feld via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Sebastian Feld <sebastian DOT n DOT feld AT gmail DOT com>
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 55NINTnk3761360

On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 10:52 AM Corinna Vinschen
<corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 20 13:33, Sebastian Feld wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 12:03 PM Johannes Schindelin
> > <johannes DOT schindelin AT gmx DOT de> wrote:
> > >  winsup/cygwin/path.cc | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/path.cc b/winsup/cygwin/path.cc
> > > index 42919a7cf5..ed08398930 100644
> > > --- a/winsup/cygwin/path.cc
> > > +++ b/winsup/cygwin/path.cc
> > > @@ -1855,9 +1855,18 @@ symlink_native (const char *oldpath, path_conv &win32_newpath)
> > >        while (towupper (*++c_old) == towupper (*++c_new))
> >
> > 1 unrelated issue:
> > I think this towupper() code is WRONG if the filesystem (e.g. WSL) is
> > case-sensitive!
>
> The preceding comment tries to explain why we always compare case
> insensitive.  There's a high probability that the symlink will be used
> by native (non-Cygwin) processes which are insensitive.

OK, but this is at least bad for performance.

Some stats from a profiling tool I am working on:
German language, multibyte locale, codepage 65001:
Each towupper() traverses 11 functions, covering between 8002 and
11722 instructions, and between 260 and 469 branches, on 64bit.
If the code could just use the per-volume case sensitive flag, then
this could be reduced to 20-30 instructions just to do the indirect
load (2 times) and compare.

> > How can code in cygwin.dll test whether the current path is on a
> > case-sensitive volume, or not?
>
> There's a twist here.  NTFS or ReFS or other filesystems (but not FAT)
> are usually case sensitive.  It's the OS which makes them case insensitve
> by using a specific flag at open time, combined with a kernel registry
> key.  So apart from FAT, the creator of a file decides if it's created
> sensitive or insensitive, and the one searching for and opening a file
> is deciding if the search/open is sensitive or insensitive.
>
> Also, we're creating the symlink via CreateSymbolicLinkW, which is
> probably acting case insensitive anyway...
>
> What if the perr-dir case-sensitive
> > feature is ON, should that be probed and handled too?
>
> ...unless the symlink is created in a case sensitive dir, I assume.
>
> Right now we don't handle case sensitive dirs in the path_conv code.  We
> only check for the kernel registry key and the FILE_CASE_SENSITIVE_SEARCH
> filesystem flag.
>
> To add the sensitive dirs to the picture, path_conv() would have to
> check every directory on NTFS for
> NtQueryInformationFile(FileCaseSensitiveInformation). It would then
> set the path_conv::caseinsensitive flag accordingly.

Yikes. Does Windows cache this per-dir info somewhere?

Sebi
-- 
Sebastian Feld - IT security consultant

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -