DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 524BdsHZ3389629
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 524BdsHZ3389629
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=PtNhp+s3
X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D92C43858C60
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1741088393;
	bh=b5oqvJ5YrMpvGWAyjhrW1Tsk0cl3sogFLDbnZJSMHo8=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	From;
	b=PtNhp+s3igVCIG/PFEPKz/nwPBOSZdB4ZM76jF6+7OCt7PcIccRl/5T/a/x0IrT+8
	Ho3BNi7rNhj13iSEL2SemL2Yc8g1+KV/FLh+Q5nVbT0aAFMJzJIo2qkJaXWxyRCEKp
	v/MzuY5cq9AGoKz/hmj+Ml76pF77xJMjWhx8NFqM=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 87C1A3858D21
Date:	Tue, 4 Mar 2025 12:38:52 +0100
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin 3.6: Supporting 128 POSIX realtime (SIGRTMAX-SIGRTMIN >=
	128) signals?
Message-ID:	<Z8bmTHdZ8aDXXj9D@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CAPJSo4V-o3uXn7kFo1T93keo1w_SVTsGVEdycOfQDQC-L4KZCA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<Z8WVxlEujfFlRrVn AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<CAPJSo4X0Vt3SafShOiQFNnR3oFCi2ZjRiutEMpeeyESp2XbtkA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<Z8bRMfg87ZSWfscd AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<CAPJSo4VvuS6EQvwb8T4uZa=BJ2Nx4L6zVD7uvQiKp7cGx18qmw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAPJSo4VvuS6EQvwb8T4uZa=BJ2Nx4L6zVD7uvQiKp7cGx18qmw@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Mar  4 12:20, Lionel Cons via Cygwin wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 11:08, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin
> <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mar  3 23:07, Lionel Cons via Cygwin wrote:
> > > On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 at 12:43, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin
> > > <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Feb 28 15:36, Lionel Cons via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > > We've hit a scalability issue in Cygwin today, the application in
> > > > > question ran out of POSIX realtime signals (i.e. SIGRTMIN-SIGRTMAX).
> > > > >
> > > > > Could Cygwin support 128 POSIX realtime signals?
> > > >
> > > > Not possible.  sigset_t is an unsigned long, thus we can only support
> > > > up to 64 signals.
> > > >
> > > > A change to a bigger sigset_t is an ABI breakage and requires two
> > > > different entry points for all functions touching the sigset_t type, one
> > > > for the new definition of sigset_t, one for backward compatibility with
> > > > existing applications.  This *could* be part of 3.7, but I don't make
> > > > any promises.
> > >
> > > gcc has int128_t - would that help you?
> >
> > Not at all.  It doesn't change the underlying problem of the ABI breakage.
> 
> That is... bad.
> For the new ABI, maybe store a pointer to the byte array which holds
> the signal bits, and the array has a size prefix, so it can be
> extended on demand? Public functions only use pointer+size then...

It's not about how to do a new ABI.  It's about when and who does it.

- Very certainly not in 3.6.
- *Maybe* in 3.7.
- Do we have a volunteer creating a patch?


Corinna

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -