DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 51QDb5vj163599
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 51QDb5vj163599
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=ZC5yz9Qc
X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 65BB53858D26
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1740577023;
	bh=eSWrVxtDbIYD8dY5kBAnhcnbU2kbVi7WtoKk5JtUmEI=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	From;
	b=ZC5yz9QcIRIcgIT1eG+4etdtozJisZhQqJmYgQciOwM8EyyPKWDkz1tNSsyXBHHHG
	7wBelD1fARr7tg+svIOnayKBk2qVr1QWKg6kYqK3FJKRaYWF0XE7E0kVPNdL80Xkge
	B2uld+Bl+3+D7BwPxuog8SHT6mzF0R/P1PL6PzD4=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 93D4C3858D26
Date:	Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:36:39 +0100
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Registering new |WNNC_NET_*| keys ? / Re: Document support for @
	character in UNC paths
Message-ID:	<Z78Y5xXF_nIqsY9B@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CANH4o6NW7NnygLoRgWmMMV7qY4UwK6vKnVKCRX2u=9MCWhdMdg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<Z7hVWK1_pzYrIzBG AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<CALWcw=E4kcJ+UbsRkqkFpgRx734H33NhJhspuVH2KgDzV4jL3g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<Z7my7gejHoLjf2F1 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<CALWcw=EqzTv-J5pm1DVT8Un+J2QWLtV70nF1nU9DO_P3Cg4OOg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CALWcw=GDQ0kPGXBXMa3-9LdFX3fjsVdUK-VS1TpwdO_XtFvXMA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<Z73yniyu8UVlSafF AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<CALWcw=HuN79qXaupYvXuFSWXNj0LmAxV4-EWsCgyYJ63xkVn1Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<ba7af2e1-87e7-71fe-7a19-be5cd8587369 AT jdrake DOT com>
	<CAKAoaQnxk+OtYxHr_9g=0D6Pb9N1sDXjqNirt5LWze-apyybEw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAKAoaQnxk+OtYxHr_9g=0D6Pb9N1sDXjqNirt5LWze-apyybEw@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 51QDb5vj163599

On Feb 26 11:15, Roland Mainz via Cygwin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 2:22 AM Jeremy Drake via Cygwin
> <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Feb 2025, Takeshi Nishimura via Cygwin wrote:
> > > No, it's beegfs.sys you install.
> > > SMB is not used, it uses its own protocol. If you do a
> > > FileRemoteProtocolInfo query the protocol field says it's a
> > > WNNC_NET_RDR2SAMPLE.
> >
> > Always nice when a driver doesn't change "sample" idenfiers.  It seems
> > Virtualbox shared folders also squats on this identifier.  I imagine
> > things don't go well if one attempts to install beegfs.sys on a virtualbox
> > virtual machine with their guest drivers installed...
> 
> I think the problem is that no one in the OpenSource world really
> knows how to register new |WNNC_NET_*| keys. QEmu shared folders,
> DOKANY, ms-nfs41-client, etc. all use |WNNC_NET_RDR2SAMPLE| because
> the sample filesystem code uses that.

So if ms-nfs41-client uses WNNC_NET_RDR2SAMPLE, we don't have to handle
these shares when checking the WNNC_NET_MS_NFS provider.  While it would
be nice if the nfs v4 driver would use some other WNNC type, this is
at least helpful for handling WNNC_NET_MS_NFS shares, because they
have more than one quirk...


Corinna

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -