www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
DMARC-Filter: | OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 51MHPrkw1547298 |
Authentication-Results: | delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com |
Authentication-Results: | delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com |
DKIM-Filter: | OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 51MHPrkw1547298 |
Authentication-Results: | delorie.com; |
dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=LW4hTart | |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Filter: | OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B50883858C42 |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; |
s=default; t=1740245151; | |
bh=M1H7z1HVY02zbitXKkOCV12S4jFN0hysz+ab70bIQjc=; | |
h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: | |
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: | |
From; | |
b=LW4hTartkMneo+kPc9TZoogUFNZZngwR/SrefFJwmtOsPCp/4IHkZ7FPpkRDFghQm | |
dIGj3XS4dm2oVFILAS/ZxaealuD4cWE3fO4ct8bn8QY+UbMaV2tAjtMGUOK8klcYSN | |
qSdozEiu6rhRxW91yF0MPK29FBG7udZDchdOo+5w= | |
X-Original-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
DMARC-Filter: | OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 5DC903858D1E |
ARC-Filter: | OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 5DC903858D1E |
ARC-Seal: | i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1740245090; cv=none; |
b=iPo1ZNXgJfaiPAJBMY7UCKN5QWVeK6BRvYWFirVREzbPshXWiMSGUj8gLJEtCOx0DlIyRdTmYTZp9+AVUinbYHErd6taYlCPNV1PaG9QIDSHK1BaVW26zuqEVOcrojmZRTKTGC5d+vRxfBGy30cn4Qd//yUPGQ1ajCp0CIakdoY= | |
ARC-Message-Signature: | i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; |
t=1740245090; c=relaxed/simple; | |
bh=r6453s4MMnMXDrP9SGo2tJ/8O56NjF5sx2EhfwQH1vM=; | |
h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; | |
b=Vf+oUm4Bg8Rx5hj1LN1Tcc1kvlC61XWNWVVRAWGxZ5m98+Fe9kTeU+HgQUV4Iytqo2WVEYJ5788cu6TuDKw+iWcE9yZUsvyeFJiOmaFTJn0WOnIfkJk2IxE07u/FzT2kodMrSY8c/B4Oan9TVmF3avUUpceHTv9MKgjFZirzcuk= | |
ARC-Authentication-Results: | i=1; server2.sourceware.org |
DKIM-Filter: | OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5DC903858D1E |
Date: | Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:24:49 -0800 (PST) |
X-X-Sender: | jeremyd AT resin DOT csoft DOT net |
To: | Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: [CALL FOR TESTING] Cygwin-3.6.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <Z7mysSoCPc5tu1cB@calimero.vinschen.de> |
Message-ID: | <7dc539c9-c4dc-085c-6691-f0fc97076246@jdrake.com> |
References: | <Z7RUxWZt7iN9wxR1 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> |
<aba49b13-6ae4-b9ed-298b-68c4887ee55e AT jdrake DOT com> | |
<Z7mysSoCPc5tu1cB AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-BeenThere: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Mailman-Version: | 2.1.30 |
List-Id: | General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe> | |
List-Archive: | <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help> |
List-Subscribe: | <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe> | |
From: | Jeremy Drake via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Reply-To: | Jeremy Drake <cygwin AT jdrake DOT com> |
Errors-To: | cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com |
Sender: | "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
On Sat, 22 Feb 2025, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > On Feb 21 14:35, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote: > > 2. This seems to have fixed a severe performance regression in Curl's test > > suite (https://github.com/curl/curl/pull/16217) that I was recently > > looking into. My research tracked it down to c7fe29f ("Cygwin: pipe: > > Restore blocking mode of read pipe on close()/raw_read()"), reverting that > > got performance back to normal. The fhandler/pipe.cc code changed > > significantly in master vs 3.5. > > This sounds a bit ambiguous to me. > > Do you see this performance regression with the latest 3.6.0 test > release, or does it fix this performance regression? Sorry. Regression introduced between 3.5.4 and 3.5.7 (we skipped 3.5.5 and 3.5.6). "Bisected" (really, educated guess found it on the first try) to c7fe29f. Fixed in 3.6.0. -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |