DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 51MBKEDQ1371646
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 51MBKEDQ1371646
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=IeR5aJKr
X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C8981385840B
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1740223212;
	bh=hHJLlbRP2P+ZbJ7vTZp1cF/73uHrm4XmufVciw1qQ/o=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	From;
	b=IeR5aJKrMxaYeK250BXBI4bu9HcBO8Tk+Cs21DVHKAQfc5h4Jz5B+KWoOgErbrXac
	FOZvlW88geyQa+Z14+lfKQeFLpNcP7KcJNXjAz9MEoKe/N70sI/1h0a9K7kFy331uU
	ZuM0oqy4ZIp9hr7OzYjytkdK/MGVlwytWgJDa2JU=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 231543858D26
Date:	Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:19:13 +0100
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [CALL FOR TESTING] Cygwin-3.6.0
Message-ID:	<Z7mysSoCPc5tu1cB@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<Z7RUxWZt7iN9wxR1 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<aba49b13-6ae4-b9ed-298b-68c4887ee55e AT jdrake DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<aba49b13-6ae4-b9ed-298b-68c4887ee55e@jdrake.com>
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Feb 21 14:35, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote:
> I rebased msys2's msys2-runtime fork of cygwin on top of cygwin's master
> branch, and then rebased git-for-windows' msys2-runtime on top of THAT.
> 
> 1. Git for Windows's test suite still passes with that (which is nice, it
> tended to hang when we did this with 3.5.5).
> 
> 2. This seems to have fixed a severe performance regression in Curl's test
> suite (https://github.com/curl/curl/pull/16217) that I was recently
> looking into.  My research tracked it down to c7fe29f ("Cygwin: pipe:
> Restore blocking mode of read pipe on close()/raw_read()"), reverting that
> got performance back to normal.  The fhandler/pipe.cc code changed
> significantly in master vs 3.5.

This sounds a bit ambiguous to me.

Do you see this performance regression with the latest 3.6.0 test
release, or does it fix this performance regression?


Corinna

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -