DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 51JD0O5W3947791
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 51JD0O5W3947791
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=XYjSW4L0
X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D583D3858417
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1739970022;
	bh=6hbIQKtML7ST6a9f31gY5dcSQf7PGxot9qzc8wwAMc0=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	From;
	b=XYjSW4L05UWpZHIpaN7ecmIFAyG0+3/ayr3Z7Gq0z7vDiMrN0E/Fj4v6Q0N86xhfn
	vdrBe7oGnQUqsKCJ5l7RsvagIKFoxa8e69z0LijQeehkYMye9KxlVRu/Sy0DiTVIsQ
	TErKGqqW6B7LGzVx+UJa1t9+7I8k6KC5jlsdDgDw=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org F07E83858C42
ARC-Filter:	OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org F07E83858C42
ARC-Seal:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1739969940; cv=none;
	b=H4aITJH88omMFndxmthqf2havbIwtp1vtFxmeOUY1UfXEtnNMWGR9H68GtHtLn5skBtI+z/6SGaxeRYU/G/PrMgkUqpQzeOprdI06rFRwl3Jh0/zLGq7BmE7+VbEf88WsYMZkmPnHFZ+lNyYHjj1ll0VZv1aXqHmJkYc8RfpJSA=
ARC-Message-Signature:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1739969940; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=nOUcXpUZsHEJkrYdcWL301EZwRA7NMM+5WK7Y+waSX8=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version:DKIM-Signature;
	b=jwbI3wZQT7hmUyfcWrmf+wt4QATq/xUWeoC2+rUPxTpW1O+8vg5ZjG79/0dWtEHyq08pf2+CsahCyV1dWX53DeD0qDfbWW+rryffPOkxBirhANzXjALCkw02PSfzIqJlztQ6gEQ31a+LjELE9C1WcoETz0JeU8nvLOw2S+wz/Z8=
ARC-Authentication-Results:	i=1; server2.sourceware.org
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F07E83858C42
Date:	Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:58:49 +0900
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: lost output after pipe redirection
Message-Id:	<20250219215849.81bc27632686b1ed9f44b7d5@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To:	<20250219204205.ba1dfa7265ba68cf0deee14e@nifty.ne.jp>
References:	<6bc117eb-ece2-43a7-91ae-6ab17d62f6ca AT gmail DOT com>
	<20250218205647 DOT 41b64c0fded65dc9bc681589 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<32abf18d-488e-4658-b006-96c62cfd1f00 AT gmail DOT com>
	<20250219073813 DOT 7b26b8db73e055b9f1d2c75b AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<20250219204205 DOT ba1dfa7265ba68cf0deee14e AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 20:42:05 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 07:38:13 +0900
> Takashi Yano wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 21:59:36 +0100
> > Marco Atzeriwrote:
> > > On 18/02/2025 12:56, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > Hi Marco,
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:28:11 +0100
> > > > Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > > >> Hi Takashi,
> > > >>
> > > >> I think there is still issue on pipe redirection output lost.
> > > >> I have two cases where during package tests the test are reported as
> > > >> failures as the output is missing, while running the test stand alone
> > > >> the output is produced as expected.
> > > >>
> > > 
> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > 
> > > > This is not a pipe problem, but just a path problem for gdbmtool.
> > > > Please try the patch attached.
> > > 
> > > Thanks Takashi,
> > > 
> > > it works.
> > > I reported the solution upstream.
> > 
> > I forgot to mention, but this problem does not occur in Linux.
> > I don't know why.
> 
> I digged this deeper.
> 
> I noticed that this is not a simple path problem. Even if gdbmtool.exe
> is in the path, running it fails if the directory named gdbmtool exists
> in the path prior to gdmtool.exe.
> 
> Simple test case which reproduce this problem is attached. This problem
> occurs if the executable is linked with libtool.
> 
> The expected output of the test case is:
> Hello 1
> Hello 2
> Hello 3
> 
> However, the output in cygwin is:
> Hello 1
> 127
> Hello 3
> 
> The culprit would be libtool or cygwin1.dll. libtool is the large
> scale shell script, so I do not find the cause so far.

This seems to be a problem of libtool. With the test case I attached
previous mail, the stub executable should call execv() with:
<path to the test case>/b/.libs/hello.exe
because hello.exe is in the directory "b".
However, it calls execv() with:
<path to he test case>/a/.libs/hello.exe

Achim, any idea?

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -