DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 51J6hgfr3816219
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 51J6hgfr3816219
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=sP/h95Ue
X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5453C3858C35
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1739947420;
	bh=V01orRU5zopkKm22v1SUoRvdec4RpvvrZRC07L1LE5Y=;
	h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	From;
	b=sP/h95UehEXnhqMQ5E4XlRaFqJ8UfgaKO85ppgAIatApCrQJ9Jw/EQEdiZWokw5Oq
	TheVFyQNf+l6SK1bXwsa55CqtZIedbRJQLmWhVcGAGhK2OrvdJxmWn2gDv2Q1uOSEk
	xus3G+7sSDWFfiaky+plq4ShzNVc+3/CVmHIh7Fg=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 5B9543858C42
ARC-Filter:	OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 5B9543858C42
ARC-Seal:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1739947344; cv=none;
	b=KVS0URVmbWPDayTRe6eCyeXMAXnz56S4rS+aDT0IUzXpg3MqRsa7EFpW5WbHMKRwjCXbSsFnjQJYsVbwz2U8WhrSeBkBxABBtblZex1I21P9pURH6g7vvQ6xly8d3Y3lppox6Ac40dDaNgKnDqYZFHRsmQ80pjqJhQPB+y7Vs10=
ARC-Message-Signature:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1739947344; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=34tDRqDJ9V92/zvNJePjgeKbLgGf77OvzsowuJurHc0=;
	h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To;
	b=DP04zxZ6OcUnY0ysdWGZRvtX66XjESp2hcjelrcvsUpLEOwXnd5uo6oLRQFi1rzOaD258jH3ETo7YEpljO8EU18gEXauW4of9vxipk6u69mMe0sRj33nJe9FEMes7wBjVHmDhP0Gck31j5/qbRAy6QIB4U0vu8lzgB/BvQ7xKDs=
ARC-Authentication-Results:	i=1; server2.sourceware.org
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5B9543858C42
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1739947343; x=1740552143;
	h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
	bh=F8WRDRNkEev3y5LT8Ipw2EjlZG9BB6S/x8YrH9l6KZs=;
	b=XaTljlljxYS13cDkROuYSNcM1Dm7vdTxLal3GrzvQ2oGdvx9wuqoQRzOhxovs7Ov94
	9IduSF0jGZMHyDSBDbO5YawCFtOreQ+DpQaze6pyIBs/n2ckYtjaGv6epOb/682Tbl6/
	Bh/QFL+l1M0H8AanG+pKh7G3eOqPRoPtl4AHNkOVZy8dvwRgLpW0E7pXQVie1ux3jI6f
	a4d60thBHIbZjucpATMos+izw3PWwz3K7OzV5SXXu9SEVuCvInaa1WoBsuXBqW2MOAX0
	bxmEMsqZCyuI0Z2gFerYU1jNhgezh+tp+ZiTIdm1QKKipVKun0hbSmbLhTuQM5qBLvKm
	kk9A==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOJu0YyCW/fbrAs6d1RKf+6J+SFnzFaaojqXParaHptmI4p4hImhwKnA
	NHdGBdcxnMKQyhz99Ff47q7xY78OVw3lS7kmdobyglDO8Td4LlTZDCGKkWZg3sCz5okg+vlR7zx
	daAkmZ5PgCJBHr9MLmIUT2OEsVfaM4A==
X-Gm-Gg:	ASbGnctkfPQILGFPPpZTCANk5dluZMoq/yhNWooQNHpvhX+9ntr2P2Mmrq07I/AwHaY
	4ZhMwWtC6AOMlbsndtjKB9Noh306JmwVzUfl7clSNg5+CCi3yGy+gO4Dc/nc+gXfS/gsL69597w
	==
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	AGHT+IGoUAlge75kz/3LRQi26sPKNtsN3wKJEHedcABXCKyIPr4Hepss3RHNwaIa1rMNBUkMPyY1botqEl5/jvAhGXc=
X-Received:	by 2002:a17:90b:4b8c:b0:2ee:e18b:c1fa with SMTP id
	98e67ed59e1d1-2fcb5a9a0c4mr3702362a91.28.1739947342905; Tue, 18 Feb 2025
	22:42:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<CALXu0UfOeEOsp4=zEa3Q3-9GjCmcQC6RCwdy2QEFA2uVvqRLhg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<e8ab61d0-9893-6c20-e234-f58355d30189 AT jdrake DOT com>
	<Z7TZkWITTUxxnhf8 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<328ed80b-aadb-262b-fd7b-37d0cc04c88e AT jdrake DOT com>
	<Z7TfpSKvHtBxPd9f AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<7fde8a02-a591-e86c-8699-f457bef86134 AT jdrake DOT com>
	<Z7TnTG1luf3DaNYy AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<Z7TnTG1luf3DaNYy@calimero.vinschen.de>
Date:	Wed, 19 Feb 2025 07:42:00 +0100
X-Gm-Features:	AWEUYZkYtPPiSVfqlSezwye8w-KYcewiNtp-ic-cGEzqFeYk0LI_LhMoBd_4bWI
Message-ID:	<CALXu0UddJT9UAeb29Nv9y3-cDRUHfGhuqECCLGYwSyyjt_YCNg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	UNC mounts missing in df -k Re: [regression-3.6] df -k on Cygwin 3.6
	no longer lists all filesystems
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Cedric Blancher via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Cedric Blancher <cedric DOT blancher AT gmail DOT com>
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 at 21:02, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin
<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 18 11:41, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Feb 2025, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> >
> > > On Feb 18 11:19, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 18 Feb 2025, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yep. Are you going to create a patch?
> > > >
> > > > I'm not seeing a particularly clean way to do this.  Bring back
> > > > available_drives, mask off bits when we see the corresponding drive root
> > > > from dos_drive_mappings, and return those drive letters whose bits are
> > > > still set at the end?
> > >
> > > No, I wouldn't do that.
> > >
> > > IMHO, the cleanest way to bring this back is to extend
> > > dos_drive_mappings::dos_drive_mappings():
> > >
> > > - Prior to the FindFirstVolumeW/FindNextVolumeW loop, prepend another
> > >   loop iterating over GetLogicalDrives() or GetLogicalDriveStringsW().
> > >   In the loop, call QueryDosDevice and add this info to
> > >   dos_drive_mappings, just as in the FindVolume loop.
> > >
> > > - In the second loop, simply ignore all mounts mounted to just a drive
> > >   letter (because the first loop already added them all).
> > >
> > > Makes sense?
> >
> > The second loop would have to go back over the list created by the first
> > loop, to see if the volume it's trying to add already has an entry, and if
> > so extend its dosmount linked list with additional (non-drive-letter
> > roots) mounts for that volume.  I guess it only needs to do that if there
> > are any volumes which have both drive-letter-root AND
> > non-drive-letter-root mounts, so that's not TOO bad.
>
> I'm pretty sure the second loop doesn't have to do much testing.
>
> GetLogicalDrives/GetLogicalDriveStringsW both return *all* simple drive
> letter mount points valid for the current user.
>
> So in the second loop, you can just skip all simple drive letter mount
> points returned by GetVolumePathNamesForVolumeNameW, without further
> testing.  They already have been returned above.  You only have
> to memorize the mount points mounted on directories in this loop.
>
> You *could* first do the FindFirstVolumeW/FindNextVolumeW loop and
> *then* the GetLogicalDrives/GetLogicalDriveStringsW loop, but in this
> case you really have to check every single drive letter if it already
> has shown up in the first loop...
>
> > I'll try to make a patch for this.
>
> Great!

What about UNC mounts, like mounting the Microsoft NFSv3 filesystem
with an UNC path? This should be listed, too - as "net use" lists
those mounts

Ced
-- 
Cedric Blancher <cedric DOT blancher AT gmail DOT com>
[https://plus.google.com/u/0/+CedricBlancher/]
Institute Pasteur

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -