DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 51CIxPwg885539
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 51CIxPwg885539
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=ByPon88G
X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 81DE5385841E
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1739386763;
	bh=FyjqNB5aJhFPGZoZwxb0U+08oTJdKXfTUjYfbhmtOrQ=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	From;
	b=ByPon88GN5uyz9tbNOIfQU4MdnC5vmjTVDTwQYUQZv0OqviHvkLUZ+BmKZ7X2tMbh
	s3ICW4WhimmNDWnsVlUcHECy85ej7neq8cZ9R3NuunGYsBwadMtk3ovxGnXfeIxXfo
	/77NBADgwXstZXpD9yVSTA6BYeKY+VnzOLT7TPEM=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D0E6E3858C53
Date:	Wed, 12 Feb 2025 19:57:50 +0100
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: __builtin_thread_pointer
Message-ID:	<Z6zvLkm9IFAtm0jR@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<9c6a1ccc-d2fb-4aaf-b8c2-29574fa640b4 AT cornell DOT edu>
	<D47E777E-C732-47BD-81C8-5A488E38E1F3 AT unified-streaming DOT com>
	<6faedefc-eb17-4b02-89b9-44b73e82d43f AT SystematicSW DOT ab DOT ca>
	<0252F948-10C3-4B9E-943D-ACA35E190726 AT unified-streaming DOT com>
	<87935cbb-4a43-4ebd-b8cb-125ecfcbcdc3 AT SystematicSW DOT ab DOT ca>
	<BE17AA1A-EA85-40C9-AE04-46E689B27FF8 AT unified-streaming DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<BE17AA1A-EA85-40C9-AE04-46E689B27FF8@unified-streaming.com>
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Feb 11 23:52, Dimitry Andric via Cygwin wrote:
> Yes, that is the RISCV or SH specific method. On x86_64, you access it via the fs register, i.e. gcc (on Linux at least :) compiles:
> 
>   void *p = __builtin_thread_pointer();
> 
> to something like:
> 
>   	movq	%fs:0, %rax
> 	movq	%rax, -8(%rbp)
> 
> If somebody knows how to build the Cygwin gcc package from scratch,
> they could inspect the config.log file, to see what that says about
> TLS detection.

https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2025-February/257300.html

As I wrote it's different on Windows and there's no good equivalent.

On Windows, %fs points to the TEB on 32 bit x86, while it's %gs on
x86_64.

The TEB is not the same thing as the TCB in NPTL, which is what
__builtin_thread_pointer() returns.

I don't think we can implement this in a way which is even marginally
similar...


Corinna

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -