X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2DDA53858421
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1704240752;
	bh=DnZRoEKXSK8TT25BTTLeroLi5IxOB9W30KhUYjl4wXc=;
	h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:
	List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:
	From:Reply-To:From;
	b=Vzk27Ft8QZZUcPnXuLOv2iKiscsMNFWymX+Qp9nxhCCUwYZx32FxgNxwO88Bqw+LB
	tOwnijSLTdwB5dXBxPJNg5UaM+CCYyezajvJ8cpac31xjlqVygr5kusHduS2uAeitE
	31nB8ivhEK5kd0Z0onU+XtTOmf0V/tBRy2xqItD4=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B3C483858C66
ARC-Filter:	OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org B3C483858C66
ARC-Seal:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1704240689; cv=none;
	b=UMEUpgyym5ykQ9WT3c83wIb2O7vP5ye2MY5Vw9o3IkHan+D2utCs4BwkcERmUoC0XtM1wNuv+vemoLWqZ+M3ZhY0r8qZWDMDIjuPA6vFajFS+pgn3Dz8pqXlBfBl69X8Mkf8/q/6GiR47q6pamSEoJuodLbPLe+0eTPo0OqlnL0=
ARC-Message-Signature:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1704240689; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=pGXcOqR0CGzQQG2W3oFg9c92S7eklo0ee7RarvdCC10=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version;
	b=xYlfxVM+vw0O+thlrqWka8/oLoZowYIZPyXcJPHT+HWS1hFR+KI6nfEK967feAk+4W4SYAxWQLanT5FYBpTh/NI1ExhnLP+r8CvnFBpODPhoighe7WbjfBQywFT9+aXqTNI3qBesi8znjy7QGWF9prTCYGM83oZWsEHK07enr2Y=
ARC-Authentication-Results:	i=1; server2.sourceware.org
Date:	Wed, 3 Jan 2024 09:11:24 +0900
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	Kaz Kylheku <kaz AT kylheku DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Possibly buggy use of ctype.h macros.
Message-Id:	<20240103091124.7b4b9e2f7a896c0c2fe416ab@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To:	<5d6e0d9bbeef1d4184b6067845d1e5a5@kylheku.com>
References:	<e7301d2e6aef776277cd6d81be0424a8 AT kylheku DOT com>
	<20240103082556 DOT 8ba92d98e1023f6e6fb175e2 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<5d6e0d9bbeef1d4184b6067845d1e5a5 AT kylheku DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
	NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:56:00 -0800
Kaz Kylheku <kaz AT kylheku DOT com> wrote:

> On 2024-01-02 15:25, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 14:18:15 -0800
> > Kaz Kylheku via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
> >> I noticed that this macro, defined in winsup/cygwin/local_includes/path.h:
> >>
> >>   #define isdrive(s) (isalpha (*(s)) && (s)[1] == ':')
> >>
> >> is being used with arguments of type char, like dereferenced "char *" pointers.
> >>
> >> Unless the isalpha implementation is robust against this, it should be isalpha((unsigned char) *(s)).
> > 
> > 
> > https://cygwin.com/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=blob;f=newlib/libc/ctype/ctype_.h;h=a73870b3e4ade5545fd41bcc6f10446a22b4b46e;hb=HEAD
> 
> I see, so on Cygwin, the negative index is allowed, thanks to a displacement.
> 
> # define DEFAULT_CTYPE_PTR      ((char *) _ctype_b + 127)
> 
> But, 127? A (signed) char can go to -128. '\x80' will access _ctype_b[-1]. Is that also somehow OK?
> 
> (Tangential remark: all ctype implementations have to handle at least one negative value, namely EOF.)

https://cygwin.com/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=blob;f=newlib/libc/ctype/isalpha.c;h=8b8e78a296359a4a8b3687fd76b1b73cd707a6da;hb=HEAD

Perhaps, the off-by-one is for EOF as you guess.

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -