X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 048613858034
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
	header.from=dronecode.org.uk
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dronecode.org.uk
Authentication-Results:	btinternet.com;
	auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney AT btinternet DOT com;
	bimi=skipped
X-SNCR-Rigid:	61A69BAC052AD9F4
X-Originating-IP:	[81.129.146.209]
X-OWM-Source-IP:	81.129.146.209 (GB)
X-OWM-Env-Sender:	jonturney AT btinternet DOT com
X-VadeSecure-score:	verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean
X-RazorGate-Vade:	gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddruddugdduvddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuueftkffvkffujffvgffngfevqffopdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddunecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeflohhnucfvuhhrnhgvhicuoehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffkeeigfdujeehteduiefgjeeltdelgeelteekudetfedtffefhfeufefgueettdenucfkphepkedurdduvdelrddugeeirddvtdelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghloheplgduledvrdduieekrddurddutdefngdpihhnvghtpeekuddruddvledrudegiedrvddtledpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhrtghpthhtoheptgihghifihhnsegthihgfihinhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehtrghkrghshhhirdihrghnohesnhhifhhthidrnhgvrdhjph
X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict:	clean 0
X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification:	clean
Message-ID:	<abd04421-8a46-3437-f86e-3fd1c1754a58@dronecode.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 17 Jan 2022 18:57:05 +0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/91.5.0
Subject:	Re: GDB looses pgrp setting in the terminal for debugged process
	after break.
To:	Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>,
	The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20210126121402 DOT 167ba4ca0d7d8b747feede9f AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<20210205193457 DOT cecc47a50865a59dc3f7041f AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<20210206002654 DOT 17dca1106da610b2f7b7b077 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<20210503011625 DOT 8656a8f7187120ace0e375ef AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<6a422002-189a-baf8-5b65-fa822a0803a7 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk>
	<20210507173340 DOT 9741cec791c2bfbb9edee4f2 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
From:	Jon Turney <jon DOT turney AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk>
In-Reply-To:	<20210507173340.9741cec791c2bfbb9edee4f2@nifty.ne.jp>
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-3570.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FORGED_SPF_HELO,
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NONE,
	TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On 07/05/2021 09:33, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> On Thu, 6 May 2021 21:31:27 +0100
> Jon Turney wrote:
>> On 02/05/2021 17:16, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
>>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 00:26:54 +0900
>>> Takashi Yano wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 19:34:57 +0900
>>>> Takashi Yano wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:14:02 +0900
>>>>> Takashi Yano wrote:
>>>>>> Hi GDB maintainer,
>>
>> Sorry! I meant to go back and look at this, but I forgot.
>>
>> Thanks for reminding me!
> 
> Thanks for replying.

I've included this patch in the gdb-11.22-1 test package.
I don't think this patch is upstreamable as is.

I guess I'd like something which stores both winpid and cygwin pid,
where the winpid is only used inside windows-nat with Win32 API calls, 
and the cygwin pid is the pid used by core code in POSIX API calls.

Unfortunately, writing that seems complex, as the 
CW_WINPID_TO_CYGWIN_PID mapping can't be done immediately after 
CreateProcess(), as some code in the inferior needs to run first (since 
to perform the mapping, it uses links created by 
pinfo::create_winpid_symlink(), called in crt0)


-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -