X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7525E3887038
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1602614226;
	bh=+IrA0ZjKcJeONRXc/A+Sg0BChjpS/YKYO2gPWdwr8d4=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:
	List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:
	Reply-To:Cc:From;
	b=HWV+4l4806dbnr6vK1J2TN7Ga3EDHhV36h9gcI9cbrH7nvYj9PtoYf50R8qUuI/aF
	xCN6QBa2htG7hW8TSYmPOJJRBuX/pNwHYJIL/1nO/sN9sGO+ps4//H2ry8KNAWfV8m
	yQTW1KTpdOPK1UMjtvudoYSL0kddWcL3aS7iF5XI=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 8007C38618E2
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 2020 20:36:50 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	Mario Emmenlauer <mario AT emmenlauer DOT de>
Subject:	Re: test -r or -x always return false on an NFS mount?
Message-ID:	<20201013183650.GW26704@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	Mario Emmenlauer <mario AT emmenlauer DOT de>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<d05f79db-5574-d408-28ce-7840cddff7ec AT emmenlauer DOT de>
	<1279009444 DOT 20201006184606 AT yandex DOT ru>
	<c5adbabd-f6c1-7a09-2af2-fdd819b76cdf AT emmenlauer DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<c5adbabd-f6c1-7a09-2af2-fdd819b76cdf@emmenlauer.de>
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K1:gWUkCudl9ntFn26naextpro6F7L0lvNovVv+alRLtVcS849L+Eo
	lmi427md4GouTUnVUXOiFia0+GZMwOgYOu1wtUmT8Wo7bA7/v3NbpeqaKGw+Tt7tAfT9ZOS
	kLDbUABLVedmc4+v9eLfqryTOb02uPp1O0rBAGVbqz4SocubreEfnDZF1Vl04B/OMAuytR1
	5Q9QC0tzL+t+PlPHmre4g==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V03:K0:wVQtnenANj4=:EywQTLixB0AVBoaXwgKcLp
	fWeeaT0ZXfK9gFcOhrDAN7nPeLQo+xmA4bkdNeiROaMzCR4EL6icQlQSIXklpBUUmtnAYrJPw
	WRGBeN6nsnWF5ti8OdEZxPhMeLsqJY+TtkPUC5Q8+YdhdodKrB2pmDBYiku4oJku4LrhS+qUP
	98aUbNkraM/vhkwE1Ce6rIFGaD1pU3VS7c+uENN0Q0yl7FOFC9HGdPucyx1ZylBZ0z5F9CS0C
	HYvDWLtVLB1Hmc/eEnbgPX6RUL4IW/8iCJ/bYl6OpR9xBErg9XQfywlnmkY4KXXQy0ayIVMsf
	d1LaM8XpB3XDmkMgI00GOYrffd0quB+0IN6XML2EQU1jzGpCQThr/MBMXt+ok3SuDvAOWUFLi
	QEj3D9ZuyrW9CUvTdTgg5QA2m0817GLilQ3exNighC6nIjyqtlCHS1/Bue5Ms5bRvzb2/bwg0
	HGuWlCPgVdU/AeYJMOa9JJ5VHavTqkIxwCBOfwm6LiXZW+xjO2QYhAAe1vaHIIZUcpANVLOdD
	nNAP8wgIvq2cLzlK6cuvQmA8g0uPehDjgHAuCgNS/GXqMKcRcafD3rHdZz2BbWvGN0buDLCpB
	cHGNA/w7bwFU4Mwa8j53srINjOyFv1JUzK2GxCcQo3Hqg1YCpTtC8I16i65odm+h/g++FvXAH
	NaMMyrOT6bppj9LOKuaLWG2oZ0nGiBM4GfRCXf6ogY7cdJN9H5EyqZKRzPjA1PD2MbQZYLEDa
	zgMG6Ihif5JJRc9k+aHR18cYo9Z2dGCboKIj7lLmF0CLSqU3iGkjQFCtp6bLSCKD2w1Xo40zU
	Q/iLZ1n9Y3G93WliKePsvTX8tUOoSzLr5NQmKiKQbhvBT9pgVqfsHEH0MSlCUU5WnR8/XH22B
	DI2t9JD0BLUILiQCCndg==
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-100.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NEUTRAL,
	TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

On Oct  6 18:10, Mario Emmenlauer wrote:
> 
> Dear Andrey,
> 
> On 06.10.20 17:46, Andrey Repin wrote:
> > Greetings, Mario Emmenlauer!
> > 
> >> thanks for the awesome Cygwin, its really great!
> > 
> >> Everything seems to work quite well, and in `ls -la` I can see the
> >> file permissions and user and group entries. But when using `test`
> >> to check for read (`test -r`) or execute permissions (`test -x`), it
> >> always returns false, even for readable files. `ls` on the other hand
> >> shows the permissions correctly, and `cat`ing the files works without
> >> problems.
> > 
> > This is a known issue. For years known.
> > test only guess -r/-w/-x results based on permissions as it sees them.
> > But it do not actually try to read/write/execute the subject, which, as you
> > can imagine, may lead to all sorts of false positives/negatives on filesystems
> > with less than trivial access control setups.
> > In other words, don't test for rwx if you can avoid it. The results MAY be
> > wrong.
> 
> 
> Ok, this explains a lot, and I almost guessed as much! But can I ask,
> do you happen to know why `ls -l` shows the "correct" permissions
> including 'r' and 'x'? It seems `ls` has some magic that `test` is
> lacking? And I can not imagine that `ls` would try to open every
> file, or does it?.
> 
> So could this "magic" be ported from `ls` to `test`?

There's something fishy in your environment.  NFS permissions from NFS
shares mounted via Microsoft's NFSv3 are read using some internal
function I got hinted at by the MSFT NFS guys at one point.  This
information is then exported as mode bits by Cygwin's stat(2) and used
accordingly by Cygwin's access(2).

Having said that, there's *no* magic at all in the user space
applications other than using Cygwin's stat(2) and access(2) functions.

Consequentially, using Cygwin's ls(1) or test(1) from coreutils, the
results are the expected ones in both cases; just tried it myself, just
to be sure.

So, what's fishy?  I don't know, but maybe you're using a non-Cygwin
test(1) accidentally?


Corinna
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -