X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 54B95385DC04
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
	header.from=SystematicSw.ab.ca
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	spf=none smtp.mailfrom=brian DOT inglis AT systematicsw DOT ab DOT ca
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=2.3 cv=LKf9vKe9 c=1 sm=1 tr=0
	a=kiZT5GMN3KAWqtYcXc+/4Q==:117 a=kiZT5GMN3KAWqtYcXc+/4Q==:17
	a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=w_pzkKWiAAAA:8 a=CCpqsmhAAAAA:8 a=AMpejqzua1VCGlgbdkcA:9
	a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=cBHe9Dk663YA:10 a=-ednrCzQSOQA:10
	a=sRI3_1zDfAgwuvI8zelB:22 a=ul9cdbp4aOFLsgKbc677:22
Subject:	Re: Two naive questions
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<AM6PR03MB52826CC0B63C6E551642D677A4D80 AT AM6PR03MB5282 DOT eurprd03 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
	<d1ba5f73-a234-4583-68bb-36993ad307bc AT gmail DOT com>
	<AM6PR03MB5282A63F0344EA760C7F4468A4D90 AT AM6PR03MB5282 DOT eurprd03 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
From:	Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Autocrypt:	addr=Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca; prefer-encrypt=mutual;
	keydata=
	mDMEXopx8xYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAnCK0qv/xwUCCZQoA9BHRYpstERrspfT0NkUWQVuoePa0
	LkJyaWFuIEluZ2xpcyA8QnJpYW4uSW5nbGlzQFN5c3RlbWF0aWNTdy5hYi5jYT6IlgQTFggA
	PhYhBMM5/lbU970GBS2bZB62lxu92I8YBQJeinHzAhsDBQkJZgGABQsJCAcCBhUKCQgLAgQW
	AgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEB62lxu92I8Y0ioBAI8xrggNxziAVmr+Xm6nnyjoujMqWcq3oEhlYGAO
	WacZAQDFtdDx2koSVSoOmfaOyRTbIWSf9/Cjai29060fsmdsDLg4BF6KcfMSCisGAQQBl1UB
	BQEBB0Awv8kHI2PaEgViDqzbnoe8B9KMHoBZLS92HdC7ZPh8HQMBCAeIfgQYFggAJhYhBMM5
	/lbU970GBS2bZB62lxu92I8YBQJeinHzAhsMBQkJZgGAAAoJEB62lxu92I8YZwUBAJw/74rF
	IyaSsGI7ewCdCy88Lce/kdwX7zGwid+f8NZ3AQC/ezTFFi5obXnyMxZJN464nPXiggtT9gN5
	RSyTY8X+AQ==
Organization:	Systematic Software
Message-ID:	<a6769081-1ed5-a020-2369-395f3a61da66@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Date:	Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:31:32 -0600
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<AM6PR03MB5282A63F0344EA760C7F4468A4D90@AM6PR03MB5282.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope:	MS4wfHm/yZzWq9c8r72ueX83wh0fmcz415ZI6nF5Rhg6NapmyOetSRrmdFVwIA27ZyAZko6P6gxO5tOSKUvWsGR1B+Q4T2l8I0Mljswq36yd8/+FuRR//6E1
	pgJ0X4bN6J5J04Q/wRF22HmwDUGg2NMmKpKTlsUZSU0pl9v34nPDWmFyPhI6JtiluAbUxAc36XyLtA==
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-20.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
	KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
	TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

On 2020-04-17 05:17, Fergus Daly via Cygwin wrote:
>>> usually it is just reply to the list on your mail program.
> Yeah, I now see how it all works. Thank you.

When Reply List doesn't work, pick Reply All and trim the To and Reply To
addresses to just the list address, and maybe a CC to what may be a
non-subscriber if you don't recognize them.

>>> Cygwin is a guest on it, we are not the maintainers.
> Understood. Thank you.

> On 17 April 2020 06:11, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> Am 16.04.2020 um 22:21 schrieb Fergus Daly via Cygwin:
>> I've been reading/writing to this list since 2001 or maybe earlier and
>> have only just Subscribe'd. Mainly because I have been aware when 
>> contributing to a thread I have always broken it by not using Follow-up 
>> properly, just artificially including the title prefix Re: in what is
>> essentially a new post.
>> Having Subscribe'd, I'm no clearer how to do this properly.
>> 1. Please can somebody point me to an instruction?
> usually it is just reply to the list on your mail program.
>> 2. Since when the new look provided by
>> https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/ ?
> new server for sourceware.org with new software in March
> https://sourceware.org/sourceware-wiki/MigrationStatus/
> Cygwin is a guest on it, we are not the maintainers.
>> Is there a way to default to the "legacy" look provided at, say,
>> https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/cygwin/2019-04/
>> but not obviously available today (even by changing 2019 to 2020 in the
>> line above)?
>> (I've looked for what I had assumed would be a long conversation on this 
>> change, but cannot find anything.)

Infrastructure issues are dealt with on:

	https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/overseers

and the move/migration was dealt with under:

	https://sourceware.org/pipermail/overseers/2020q1/thread.html
	(#start and #end anchors go to oldest and newest posts)

starting:

	https://sourceware.org/pipermail/overseers/2020q1/016620.html

You can find mentions of overseers in some sourceware pages.

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -