www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
DMARC-Filter: | OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org EE5AE3877016 |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; |
dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cs.umass.edu | |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; |
spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu | |
Subject: | Re: Why is taskset still not in util-linux? |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <1348011a-261a-2a87-d361-4e51fa8dc19f AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> |
<85ae12aa-6cc3-5d4c-5df2-25bf811ec6a9 AT maxrnd DOT com> | |
<72fea68a-b3d7-e87c-726f-8a5a2587a992 AT maxrnd DOT com> | |
<01e3d337-e5fe-f393-7634-3f1881bca315 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> | |
<dca24f26-9da9-591c-19c1-8020e5de3a4e AT maxrnd DOT com> | |
<79d7afa5-a07b-04df-c259-b76c61390f8c AT maxrnd DOT com> | |
From: | Eliot Moss <moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> |
Message-ID: | <205bb6db-81d0-3530-2c5c-8ea76351e9a0@cs.umass.edu> |
Date: | Fri, 20 Mar 2020 06:29:34 -0400 |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 |
Thunderbird/68.6.0 | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <79d7afa5-a07b-04df-c259-b76c61390f8c@maxrnd.com> |
X-Spam-Status: | No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, |
SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 | |
X-Spam-Checker-Version: | SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on |
server2.sourceware.org | |
X-BeenThere: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Mailman-Version: | 2.1.29 |
List-Id: | Cygwin mailing list <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <http://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe> | |
List-Archive: | <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help> |
List-Subscribe: | <http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe> | |
Reply-To: | moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu |
Errors-To: | cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com |
Sender: | "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com> |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 02KAU3JY026424 |
On 3/20/2020 1:54 AM, Mark Geisert wrote: > Mark Geisert wrote: >> Eliot Moss wrote: >> Rats. Sorry you've hit some snags. Are you compiling directly with 'make' or the preferred >> 'cygport util-linux.cygport build'? With the latter I didn't need to make any changes to the >> source tree; all mods were accomplished with the new patch file and changes to util-linux.cygport >> itself. > > I've reproduced your snags. It/they are due to my having forgotten another tiny update that should > have been part of the 2.33.1-cygwin-cpuset.patch file. If you 'echo "#define SYS_sched_getaffinity > 42" > /usr/local/include/sys/syscall.h' and then back out your other fix attempts, the build using > cygport should work. What an amusing hack! I especially like the sensibility of 42! :-) I will try this. When I built it last night, I got a successful compile, but it didn't do anything. For example, taskset 1 ls did not output _anything_ -- no error message and no ls output :-( ... It will be the weekend here in Australia (I'm visiting, and wondering about exactly how and when I will get home) so maybe I'll play with it some more on Saturday ... Regards - Eliot -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |