X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=T3g96zFoHzfSYQwK
	VKD8YIBrU0eWWEaLO+6eG3kiRRJWsBODZySnLUZeKZJeTEYDObUpXz2K081+J6iD
	cxYGHdEAmHNSTGk94t5S4t/x25tzkcbXGi9rwx64TgXVwM47vTaTe56HfOZnEvHP
	wcybJ2DspSnxyFyCFkcF53sKW2E=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Z6u62ACBcPMWgIB50YUq4K
	bZ0EY=; b=W1kqiKf+qkPssTfsz7VFnbHWRR2ms51WeJF6kz59SyeG5okypTZfMP
	bBtBCjvkF5T7yd+XBTu6Dp5miEFE9Tbfe349iU1ty3ufiMo5GfSB1ck8HKy3Bb98
	NeYEfJJmxin+IDhC+H2Afy8/3A3HVdPaaQ/azZ6Ky7d4Wzd1cCWk4=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=Gratz, gratz
X-HELO:	smtp-out-so.shaw.ca
Reply-To:	Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca
Subject:	Re: Cygwin installer does not select the packages specified by the -P option
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<6292aca49a07479480940ed950ac52a2 AT BELBRU-EXMP101 DOT eeas DOT europa DOT eu> <81d2ab29-8b4f-333c-eac9-af8835d3ab0c AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> <87tvb0u72p DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <a8d2b8b4dda44d2a858a1db5a71fd5b6 AT BELBRU-EXMP101 DOT eeas DOT europa DOT eu> <87k1bve72w DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <174bbdc9647347379916dee38d28c2ac AT BELBRU-EXMP101 DOT eeas DOT europa DOT eu> <877e7oakbn DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
From:	Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Openpgp:	preference=signencrypt
Message-ID:	<1b387ca1-576f-67a6-3537-5fc138520b27@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Date:	Wed, 7 Aug 2019 18:36:14 -0600
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<877e7oakbn.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 2019-08-07 12:42, Achim Gratz wrote:
> KAVALAGIOS Panagiotis (EEAS-EXT) writes:
>> I have tried the -A option, the -B option as single user to no
>> avail. There is no antivirus running. Well, there is in general in our
>> PCs, but no installed on my test machine. I have also tried another
>> mirror to re-download the packages in a local repository, but it
>> didn't work either. Can you provide your local repo data to check?
> 
> That repo is not public, no.  But if you've mirrored the repo with
> setup.exe (like your directory name seems to suggest), then I don't see
> why the repo structure should be wrong.
> 
>> Just to ensure that my local repo is not the problem.
> 
> Again, check the Windows DACL on the local repo directory down to the
> actual files.  If you have "interesting" inheritable DACL, that can lead
> to lots of fun behaviour.
> 
>>> Again, it should just work the way you were trying, but something's
>>> interfering. 
>>
>> Probably, but I would need more information to prove it. I am
>> suspecting a Windows Group Policy, but I would have to be sure and
>> prove it in order to request the exception from our Windows Team.
> 
> I've been at the receiving end of group policies gone wild, but your
> symptoms don't seem to click with that.  You might try to rename
> setup.exe to something entirely else, lest somebody targeted certain
> program names.
> 
>> I forgot to mention that we are using Windows 7 and I don't know if
>> the setup behaves different on that operating system.
> 
> I still have the odd Win7 box here and there around, I don't think that
> this makes any difference.

The OP's package list include sudo, which does not exist, diffutils and tar,
which are part of base. Should the first not fail setup, and all be omitted for
a retest?

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -