X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to
	:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=
	JFbSF7bc8/7d5M818oXImTYty1QJc7+A+zQEsc5DzQAg6qOhxX/+njCRZLcFsuvr
	/gNNUpY9HqKep7cAUgssffyr29zyO3cx9x0/Uj4GvU2MLgSq5RI0WpkX3x0ecCCJ
	dnS69Ih+/y2jJJKO8baWU9rahh5cQBgYNaHRtbKeDz4=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to
	:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=default; bh=4oj
	wAuzIp+MOCO3sqADdN0rRh04=; b=uv9ZdC9r99CT0y+EJmF87smFSZURe1ygDAp
	lqX3jqgJpmF6IVkrWmeA0yTPCPkoPju+Dt+hyZjntcE+C8L5a6Es1XnkjWW+aK+A
	KA/E/k0f/lbX5HHBCgpfnEe3KNdONevSZdDKfYEjEQveuEE7sWkPxKoULQ5QLc5G
	YmylRXek=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=recall, UD:php, documents
X-HELO:	mail-it1-f195.google.com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=p0vyBD7aWJqQViLugARLNyuurK21uMJpllLkIoqtBhQ=; b=iA28xMYyycqHbdFQQ8Tew9wZBZe/hPoUY2oN1EAGEig8zroyxE/+2H4UhQy6uOdJWf 5QJhwvrhxWm2vBWGumYUDUmoCfKdMRHkSmasvJ14artjaBxoIZ6BfdN+74DwlAmRKpNV ohec8a0o2c8jNqOYBIwf19RVdO3NSBojjKvFa7BDSNfbKihPJBiQAz6HM1/INbn93viy X5QoCFqfrGbnqgsHudABxeV6b0Xn6w2naT9GahnIrCs30/zmOCxf2QrJ4DQEaAmX+2Yt EwrCeU64QP1tjRS7Q7O94NQ4naeJBpqlMOuG26mFlguZZjYsuqo2w1JoG/eElfM6xzCq 9hdQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<739ed5ce-6902-d702-e152-65dc2c1da667 AT ssi-schaefer DOT com> <20190214162002 DOT GA4950 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <6aa280c2-4769-0772-91d9-c73a3a3d9680 AT ssi-schaefer DOT com> <20190215102251 DOT GA2702 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <f7345109-5b22-a342-df1e-940e236c2397 AT ssi-schaefer DOT com> <1282767785 DOT 20190215154502 AT yandex DOT ru> <d59689ee-4bf3-d66f-ca0b-f9cec8dda035 AT ssi-schaefer DOT com> <1787080198 DOT 20190215213542 AT yandex DOT ru> <997bbfcf-62a9-386e-ee3e-b32b5a08cc59 AT ssi-schaefer DOT com> <20190215210018 DOT GP2702 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <767726ce-4b90-085a-4457-af535980ebbf AT ssi-schaefer DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<767726ce-4b90-085a-4457-af535980ebbf@ssi-schaefer.com>
Reply-To:	noloader AT gmail DOT com
From:	Jeffrey Walton <noloader AT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Feb 2019 07:58:58 -0500
Message-ID:	<CAH8yC8n0zRsMrvLn+HtKhG2tg-ghznK=R7CkD-=FMQouppdQ1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: portable use of dos2unix WAS: Re: textmode for stdout, what is "correct" now?
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:01 AM Michael Haubenwallner
<michael DOT haubenwallner AT ssi-schaefer DOT com> wrote:
>
> On 2/15/19 10:00 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Feb 15 20:33, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> >> On 2/15/19 7:35 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
> >>> I have a different question though. The commands you presented in the OP
> >>> look like you aren't using Cygwin-suppied OpenSSL binary.
> >>
> >> This is true: The Cygwin distro does provide openssl-1.0.2p, but I'm building
> >> the *portable* Gentoo Prefix distro on Cygwin, with openssl-1.1.1a already.
> >> But whenever the Cygwin distro would bump to openssl-1.1, the same problem
> >> would arise there as well, just becomes noticed much later probably.
> >
> > Does OpenSSH build with OpenSSL 1.1.1a these days?  If so, we might
> > want to switch OpenSSL finally, too.
>
> Well, OpenSSH-7.9_p1 maybe does, according to https://bugs.gentoo.org/592578

I believe OpenSSH sidestepped OpenSSL. That is, it no longer depends
on it in a way that things matter. I don't recall the details.

As far as building OpenSSH against OpenSSL 1.1, see
https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/pull/48 .

Also see https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/OpenSSL_1.1.0_Changes,
which documents some [former] incompatibilities between other programs
and OpenSSL.

Jeff

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -