X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=eMokY1aQwj0eaWok
	oSIkaqj5IS3Au5WigVOwl1sd8mEPgNTa4XoFwjymewkXrhUK5RsTZgZ6M41a3k7N
	hrkOMG3CQLoUcgolBNsgFD/mkjwF11udI3SJVUzFMWurnodSKdRBNzx1flPLN9c8
	5sQQy2Hs87LSOj5JY+GEk/JvLpY=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=iaWXjoD0uQmd9kz9NkJbGX
	OxhvI=; b=Zo58cLniL9+tI5RmOMlX8u9CAgi6yTeGyf3HCSowZo6X7Bq/mBXevx
	HTwUVV4ZdKY/c3KcR2PywJ1AFiqsDxYRqsyN9x0w598kzfOOrhG7Xy8KPP6tM0yS
	6xpRAoC0rcWPk4nE1M/ovfLnkKNPSrc2TvVlLT2gUFiMVcyTM+QNw=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,GIT_PATCH_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=backup, Performance, scp, Geoghegan
X-HELO:	mail-pl0-f68.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=1HxhQdRXJMr8Y1sMUPNuCmi95OHOKlhnk8hlBjDc2MQ=; b=FEmGcelcWSKq3Gt1BoBIAvOcwL/9P3CdcAjhEaptpEnR+5jIPKIXLt0F7txz/xSsgl Wm15TrRCJH1DusmFT0y37LgiVpGFQVmNkMzDwiwJ0J/hJ+hjKjC1xglutvSEmR98cSnn gfEtGA58CaI2KOj5pkMJE41VTgFX/guxeS969/OEnWtJXzAdFip+J2Tpt728Z+Ivj9a9 1qxKTNMM6qo8HRgFcSTW6UAeMppuAx+drzVVSxzsbaS0V3hp3K+WykYEjjHHLJORt0NV 4/Kl3RgkW639ACVXPik9H3xZ+Bp5Efz3B15y9YbD92Db2C9j/EnN0s4OjN8V/Er9qntL AiNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AElRT7GInhS+6phPxLMSkrpE+H2kmhVUL/ucUgK2Yygaze+y2MaOf/M2 btaMScxlBSuMm5ZOtuPXW8SKwCne
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	AG47ELtYS7riPR2YV8v+IOA/Ski7CpW4kzGY2ZlH9x+tVM7K7YArSBEq4yeMpJx/q1q4hM3w0GpAjg==
X-Received:	by 2002:a17:902:30a3:: with SMTP id v32-v6mr36470027plb.123.1522086555289; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:	Re: Network Performance?
To:	L A Walsh <cygwin AT tlinx DOT org>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<a45d39ab-93e1-41d5-22c7-40a61e355fd5 AT gmail DOT com> <5AB5825C DOT 8060309 AT tlinx DOT org> <5AB6E770 DOT 8020603 AT tlinx DOT org>
From:	Jordan Geoghegan <jgeoghegan60 AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID:	<8794ec10-dcee-4ad6-bfe6-3c8c108ca5f6@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:49:14 -0700
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; OpenBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5AB6E770.8020603@tlinx.org>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 03/24/18 17:04, L A Walsh wrote:
> L A Walsh wrote:
>> Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
>>> Has anyone ever successfully transferred 150Mbps or more over the 
>>> network using scp/sftp/rsync etc on Cygwin?
>> ----
> What is more important? testing cygwin's scp/sftp/rsync, or using 'ssh'
> or running under cygwin, or transferring the file to a local backup 
> server from a windows
> client as fast as possible?
What is most important is getting reasonable performance when moving 
data via ssh, be it sftp, rsync or some other sort of data tunnelling 
via ssh. I need to pull backups from a Windows box, and am only able to 
get ~8MB/s from it. All my other machines can saturate the line, even 
this Windows box when it isn't using Cygwin. I will be testing WSL 
(Windows Subsytem for Linux) to see how its "native" rsync fares in 
comparison.
>
> Some test notes below(been benching my win<->server speeds since Win98 
> days)...
>
>> Using bs=16.0M, count=64, iosize=1.0G
>> R:1073741824 bytes (1.0GB) copied, 1.66724 s, 614MB/s
>> W:1073741824 bytes (1.0GB) copied, 3.48363 s, 294MB/s
> ---

>
> The above test only tests transfer speed -- not file i/o --
> it uses /dev/zero for a source and /dev/null for a target.

> For write, I used cygwin's 'dd' with if=/dev/zero and of=/h/null.
> For read, I used if=/h/zero and of=/dev/null.
>
Thanks for the info. Would you be able to test file performance over the 
network? If you could just try copying a ~1GB file or what have you via 
sftp or rsync with actual writes to disk, I would be very interested to 
see how the numbers change.

Jordan Geoghegan


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -