X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=GKovUmAh1kx3Xpvh
	rOuBXXxnHwhiFN4fTAC9wPcaMMU38RV5gaI0xQsEVKBgaEiCUXKLq1vofCoxaPGD
	o4bTQ7HnoT1HK3Yw7UaUmEh+H+drQzXrsbfhCKM+rlqzWrR75eS1Pj98+soJr5U1
	/kfmPdSVM4na6TaxMM+0Bt5+Ico=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=uQ8Zd8ImVJobngjXC/YBeQ
	9TC8k=; b=tJ5uaQZ6SGP4bYB0SvDjKkALbCb0JII+U9/z1NHEdC4mbLB+7DiDuF
	YxxEPCwY1K4Gf+r8bldC8F3PAFsrxVqMVwFQxBflV/BE3M4MN87MNeHWPrU4+vEP
	vFAC5TCml8aoH4l6kx4YRARWw0Xoy+BQC83yZbDXWXYZrX+JBE17c=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Exactly, H*f:sk:76251bb, H*i:sk:4e5dde6, H*MI:sk:4e5dde6
X-HELO:	mail-pg0-f49.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+2HXHgMvZJHBg4P5Nw+wjx+WFDQi8RikqaP8Qqvtlxs=; b=f0I8U9RHdNGZUE/L4RyXDsJfahAFdokiGvcOp7zQwGWq/pSKI+CzLmxFlGIRbmt5rv xXVx6n8LlxT6RBm1jztzpOPu6r1uSKKvemTqyXH7dAsCN8iK6DVUY2oMkQXnbhttBQzD RUtvOoo0piOMxw0tjpY3T0GaBpYxE37qSkyqFh1/NuEVLBcUcLUTxJBQqZPb3EAHsk3O 8RBg77GPhyaruZb1FQiniNv44XSijsyWceFTcxIP2f5T9vST/ijtYRSMkK9Vc0ncM6Rn cKTfFlQOPQVRcv2JFftOlcaQ9vGjuPe+3Ewx/eSEO6pvCgSuRA0LjzN9GoyPV85B7ck5 xTwg==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AFeK/H0/OceUf2NPGu+Hp/tznkgkgnVV9R0kGJxMjrNgnvZqlGpcXG/mT5WbqaZajMQAhw==
X-Received:	by 10.99.96.73 with SMTP id u70mr23910489pgb.29.1491311083930; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 06:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:	Re: 64bit lapack-3.7.0-1.tar.xz - Empty
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<aefa5249-51e8-c320-7614-8354b8890da1 AT gmail DOT com> <7e8b44e4-78e9-f9a8-63c1-0979bcecbb87 AT gmail DOT com> <2b672a97-dc43-492f-48d0-c1fabdb7d56c AT gmail DOT com> <76251bb5-9303-6456-11b4-755032891880 AT gmail DOT com> <4e5dde61-633a-a8c1-d143-affb537f1e0c AT gmail DOT com>
From:	Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID:	<159206dc-84d4-e34b-9be3-3d57d682b68e@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Apr 2017 15:04:36 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4e5dde61-633a-a8c1-d143-affb537f1e0c@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 04/04/2017 14:43, cyg Simple wrote:
> On 4/3/2017 11:44 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>> On 03/04/2017 17:07, cyg Simple wrote:
>>> On 4/3/2017 11:00 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>>> On 03/04/2017 16:53, cyg Simple wrote:
>>>>> The file is lapack-3.7.0-1.tar.xz 32 bytes with no contents.  I've
>>>>> tried
>>>>> two different mirrors.  There are also no dependencies applied.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reverting back to lapack-3.6.1-1.tar.xz proves that it is empty as well
>>>>> with the same no dependency rules.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> source only. all the contents is in:
>>>>
>>>> $ cygcheck -cd |grep lapack
>>>> liblapack-devel                         3.7.0-1
>>>> liblapack-doc                           3.7.0-1
>>>> liblapack0                              3.7.0-1
>>>>
>>>
>>> Then these should be installed dependents of the chosen lapack.  Source
>>> only means nothing when you can choose the binary download.
>>>
>>
>> there are today no packages depending from lapack.
>>
>
> Exactly but the binary install of lapack should require liblapack-devel
> and liblapack0.

I disagree. It will not happen for my packages

>
>> I miss the relevance of your last comment; there are
>> ~ 473 empty binary package in the distribution.
>>
>
> The installer chooses by default a binary install not a source install.
> If there are empty binary installations then those also need to change
> to install the expected binary dependencies.
>
>> Please note that lapack is empty but the debug file for the three
>> binaries is called lapack-debuginfo anyway as the upstream source file
>> is called lapack.
>
> While lapack-debuginfo isn't a requirement for lapack we understand its
> purpose and should only be installed if chosen specifically.
>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -