www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2016/05/26/10:56:14

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references
:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=
dns; s=default; b=rcbqvV/+PTVqSpSJit2rwuiQWcCL+r+7dg+F130UBp2Qye
tviaAu722LAQzrSKcAUoxZKj30xeV+46W7i2R0DL2hZaR0ieNkM9kFzm9Ol+DQ08
9WhX/++oawVRGvJDI35gohkulgXr3GgdmJKbkwQg53c9vsoNdRNPXQLHJsPOw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references
:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=
default; bh=6QGU7BOuDSWlsATTB226gn0Z9ss=; b=r7e6IxsGGyrYwu5RGBMl
G+NLvb3QkICC7okIEGRDw+1tvqixzZAKMQPyiPn/eKUi9kVysKZf/pc7P7PBpdLM
VcwEfsPTtjLl1Up50Y0onrQVokRkJZwuyIqOD7zoZEzI+rEb4fhIc6xhXzZnwIOq
LMfHnnqd+u31shey4US7CIU=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*MI:sk:44459aa, HImportance:Medium, H*M:465d, H*f:sk:44459aa
X-HELO: mout.kundenserver.de
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 16:55:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: Tobias Zawada <i_inbox AT tn-home DOT de>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <1002567840.45243.3a1a3cbe-ee7e-465d-8585-9c4a96076936.open-xchange@email.1und1.de>
In-Reply-To: <44459aa0-4381-2368-ab63-5dffc26f3344@cornell.edu>
References: <466943424 DOT 37628 DOT 394d161a-7219-415d-a659-0f774811ad2d DOT open-xchange AT email DOT 1und1 DOT de> <44459aa0-4381-2368-ab63-5dffc26f3344 AT cornell DOT edu>
Subject: Re: emacs gud-interface is not updated after gdb command execution (maybe because of incomplete output from gdb)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:fHNhLFOClYQ=:GFUinUxagMwvEUjCSBkV0V 2NTvY9TTcBdzPD23OJWYEtghH5coqVIbbbqDINbgg4x/nM3GinyoGxFqwUki7nr1O4wq4lx3S tGtAjdem7qPDyB6PpymO7NmTHW+adLp6NdOPkW0QNvwfOSJTrNzgPcynsjODJuRy+ExSK7Mjp mfNXoXZWx4E2KmDJ7jfAeJIDwZNO+8x13Kfhkgx+A4KOY3+MInM/BZ9NIfmdXC3/7j0V144gT yNUZizvB/mujQRUodXyhAhjGxZEF3V2EX78iRJIF4F0hda6OxccttbiULeJkSer6Y9ovDPNzh 8uWL6bS1WHd6iaqmvp21BRHOU9DJv6Pubs5cr6USVDmyzQG90YKbZtetTqz/HdnX1nvgurPLb aqu5Y+5gpi+uboTXdFgmY48w5jYSuJ8QkdxJ/OMBv+vhElGLFBegetE7878B3dcTEgrR16uUW XN13pg9fDsrbp9f56eD+O5Ugp96ZtOdcliWshgqDiebbPRJ6npzPmEQ+KRqSdnh5bpZnZ+GIh UfVFQp0lIefFQric4zIV/U6abYynvVreMg6z/Ef9H+OGOkyDr/mtNCztndUH8oGbe33+OygER h66gRzxrAB26WBrHSqermxBeNK4fZV9X3bFkDIof314NqZghaW6RzofUty9wt6ZC1efe8pqQe N2bAgQkaiGuxoOwjHSTB5b4noUz2S6GuFIS9Z+kfvZavAp9D/Lz4brCCpKNVesQIeFKL8uh78 wLiIDZB+58HYEj/H
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Thanks, Ken for the following info:

> This looks like a bug I reported several years ago; it actually has 
> nothing to do with emacs:
> 
>  https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-10/msg00445.html
> 
> It was fixed but then reappeared some months later:
> 
>  https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-05/msg00049.html
> 
> It was fixed again but apparently is back. The test case from the 
> original report still exhibits the problem.

I had a look at the elisp-function gdb-send.

The command process-send-string is used there for sending commands to gdb.

Is it right that the problem manifests itself already there?

The doc of process-send-string says that this command may send the string
contents as separate bunches of data.

If the output is already incomplete because of the partitioned input through
process-send-string I see no way for a cygwin-specific workaround and we must
wait for a fix of gdb.

Do you know where I should report the bug?

Best regards,
Tobias

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019