www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
DomainKey-Signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date | |
:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type | |
:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=bzOyFG62Rna8u75m | |
7TDGxwcx7qrxiJtR1DO3oOEoJpADw4yac5AnBXgCfVAhYZg0ILy6MLq2UhfokkbN | |
4D0Bq+USFjrdiO+NnaVU+FY/i2ZSeRYsiW4dhpw9XoWSCjThdwztRD+RxuE1/652 | |
K92k/L6bPsQMP0esu/MeSj4zjPw= | |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date | |
:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type | |
:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=9uLg7WtYCqZPitdx090ayj | |
yo9NE=; b=DborAZP9Ixm2nqX3WD5kj7RlsqWLLTC+y57wLsAcpUrp0kYo9nvPRO | |
wE4r/ZdndeWiF5f6EikFIYTe89HuUDCkzcgI3RYu48ZtXMvx0yQnBrAu2RGkhZuD | |
CbZQ+BqmekdGcL2SJsQy7EF+CFq/QYcZ2Y0yVe8+TSTwHkeC/46do= | |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; auth=none |
X-Virus-Found: | No |
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: | No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=0.2, Hx-languages-length:1419, mental, you! |
X-HELO: | demumfd002.nsn-inter.net |
Subject: | Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.3.0-0.4 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <announce DOT 20151022162227 DOT GC5319 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20151023T124504-347 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20151023122230 DOT GG5319 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20151023122519 DOT GH5319 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> |
From: | Thomas Wolff <towo AT towo DOT net> |
Message-ID: | <5677FD30.20502@towo.net> |
Date: | Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:22:56 +0100 |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <20151023122519.GH5319@calimero.vinschen.de> |
X-purgate-type: | clean |
X-purgate-Ad: | Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de |
X-purgate: | clean |
X-purgate: | This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information) |
X-purgate-size: | 1398 |
X-purgate-ID: | 151667::1450704177-000011B4-AAFC5C06/0/0 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
On 23.10.2015 14:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Oct 23 14:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Oct 23 11:06, Achim Gratz wrote: >>> I don't have much time to test it right now (and won't have any time at all >>> next week), but so far things look good. The problem with the 0.2 test >>> version with UID/GID mapping and not recognizing the primary domain in some >>> cases is gone (might have been a fluke anyway). Correlating the output from >>> getfacl and icacls still requires some mental gymnastics, but I didn't find >>> any obvious errors in the mode bits and ACL so far, which means that things >>> like rsync (and some file tests) will now return the correct results for the >>> cases I've looked at. >> You won't believe how grateful I am having you testing this. Thank you! >> >> Would you mind to read the comment at the start of sec_acl.cc? > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=blob;f=winsup/cygwin/sec_acl.cc;hb=a8ec1e804ee9ba2d6f8304731e593dcf167c9836#l27 > >> I'd be >> very interested in learning if the description is meaningful enough to >> other developers. I also fear we need to have an improved documentation >> explaining how this works and what NOT to do, e.g., reorder ACLs :| Sorry for the late response... The description is mostly meaningful. Just the coexistence of X and X_OBJ entries isn't self-explanatory. ------ Thomas -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |