www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
DomainKey-Signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from | |
:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id | |
:references:to; q=dns; s=default; b=pqww2vYGmFNEI1u8rtdrGHCwNy+d | |
+g1mt37G9ACX3B2UiVmIwRASsLDPJfSP0Rs9ji3lA8vHJUKir1FTVFsjMsrizP4R | |
008wwGzsd05O1ztqvG4vHAxotbZJxCeh82JAW4x/5jn4lXS+3FgE2v6p/byCRTVj | |
c5NPq4t2uqa3FcM= | |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from | |
:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id | |
:references:to; s=default; bh=exps+mEQhrGCO5isGI5jPjKZ1Hk=; b=Ll | |
H07rS3N4f2iO63c5Uz+jds6UQy77DknMaMWSovLTsQi/oOtzVz4wgFrjN1yhsPdP | |
Pn+2ymxG2Xo0S4HCw1OvFrBDURR/YCM7AtFo4xkBnGvQpO83rLDFwKqFWbfdt6f3 | |
jp+pe3zU4zb9JjU6RDWIWMiU3C38tnQ/u2McYwJ54= | |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; auth=none |
X-Virus-Found: | No |
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: | No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 |
X-HELO: | etr-usa.com |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) |
Subject: | Re: From Microsoft: Windows 10 Console and Cygwin |
From: | Warren Young <wyml AT etr-usa DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <556E01FC.6060004@redhat.com> |
Date: | Tue, 2 Jun 2015 14:49:38 -0600 |
Message-Id: | <CAB2911B-10C9-409F-B0A4-A88C3C9EB0BD@etr-usa.com> |
References: | <BY1PR03MB1436C656CEF12387D40CD74EB4D70 AT BY1PR03MB1436 DOT namprd03 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <20150429200616 DOT GL3657 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <BN3PR03MB14300D5567A2F7D86BB69A28B4D70 AT BN3PR03MB1430 DOT namprd03 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <20150430082231 DOT GB19795 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <BN3PR03MB1430B88AED4339821C7D95BEB4D50 AT BN3PR03MB1430 DOT namprd03 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <20150502133833 DOT GB12723 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <BN3PR03MB1430C0816A9D41BB051687A4B4D20 AT BN3PR03MB1430 DOT namprd03 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <1433098286892-118602 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> <20150601082456 DOT GG4308 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <BN3PR03MB14303BAD46376DED807CFA2CB4B60 AT BN3PR03MB1430 DOT namprd03 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <CAJ1KOAiG-VV2heqYSNSjwCb=s_pjxoxKaGY3SnDiy4E20yvOWw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <BN3PR03MB1430F49F8839B66558779F3AB4B50 AT BN3PR03MB1430 DOT namprd03 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <556E01FC DOT 6060004 AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t52KnrYX008628 |
On Jun 2, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com> wrote: > > On 06/02/2015 10:37 AM, Rich Eizenhoefer wrote: >> Can you provide more detail on changing isatty function to support Cygwin PTY's? I need to be able to support the request in our backlog. > > As long as we are wishing, it would be awesome if Windows natively > supported ptys as actual objects, instead of making cygwin have to > emulate them on top of other objects. In my ignorance of how ptys map to Windows console objects, I held off from asking for this when Mr. Eizenhoefer solicited ideas, but this is what I thought of at that time, too. In other words, this notion of “virtual terminals” is already implemented multiple times, following a standard that specifies the expected semantics — POSIX — so why not just do that? Why, in the end, can Windows *not* have ptys? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |