X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=KQupr7GZlUD8UVAwZqye5/zfRQOhH
	hA9RwvtRShizY9K8CesZH//v+HykwRnesNlgHWy7FKdr7Gblw0mRX7k3wId6k24l
	PHXA6ejQ2JcR70UAeSGZ8g5ORZZId8mP3XMB9btS/fN8zx3Zn8FzykaVyy0wWRVq
	grshiL56Mtd33U=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; s=default; bh=a5QlgPsJk5lGZ3wvAZvdyi0hatU=; b=C/J
	bqWYIMH8691Kxk0CyBb6UjVuEW1NZAlBKUSpFrxHbFNMGJUyrT6orYJVydDYlEkJ
	RtpeMB97QPz2/4NnATcoXNeNZDGfybaGygTwnZUaF70O/gzckrd3YfqhRb/nSUuq
	VT0r/3qUkVg/ypftK9ye8zjsokJvmYvX2dylRA7A=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
From:	Adam Dinwoodie <Adam DOT Dinwoodie AT metaswitch DOT com>
To:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Fwd: reboot command behaves different on Linux
Date:	Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:04:07 +0000
Deferred-Delivery:	Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:04:00 +0000
Message-ID:	<CE9C056E12502146A72FD81290379E9A6093928A@ENFIRHMBX1.datcon.co.uk>
References:	<CAKf2h5Q7Ui7szcGKFMip5UUvurPnGTv=C=n-iXo8Wwo0qLP4YA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <514CE853 DOT 2000000 AT gmail DOT com> <CAKf2h5SpNNQYZ8afr-4WRB+HVpOcR+mq_cTZwoQNOd=67_SMBw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130323223138 DOT GB40309 AT justpickone DOT org> <CAKf2h5QK=Z2jroWZ_S0neHAfLCpEVAGrny8cdvgt3Wb_XLw9cw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CA+sc5mkrVyC8=3jvJK4cgbAH9XQFxotS01C7aMscaBu68VVVyQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CA+sc5mkrVyC8=3jvJK4cgbAH9XQFxotS01C7aMscaBu68VVVyQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id r2QF4WtY016611

Earnie Boyd wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Frank Fesevur wrote:
>> 2013/3/23 David T-G:
>>> % This would still conflict with the -H of the ones above, but I have no
>>> % problem with it. Anyone against changing hibernate to -H?
>>>
>>> What about 'b' for hi'b'ernate?
>>
>> That was my original suggestion, but Anthony liked the -H better.
>>
>> I have given it a thought over the weekend and since the -H conflicts
>> with -H of the Linux shutdown commands, I think I prefer the -b as
>> short for hibernate.
>
> To me -b sounds like 'b;inary how about -s for 's'leep since sleep is
> synonymous with hibernate.

Sleep is very definitely not synonymous with hibernate!  Sleeping puts the
computer in a low-power mode, but keeps the computer turned on with data in
RAM.  Hibernating writes the contents of the RAM to disk, then completely
powers down the computer.

-- 
Adam Dinwoodie

Messages posted to this list are made in a personal capacity.

- Raw text -