www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,BOTNET,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-id: | <505122CC.3060306@cygwin.com> |
Date: | Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:03:24 -0400 |
From: | "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com> |
Reply-to: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 |
MIME-version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: ls shows different permissions for the same file |
References: | <AB5C244567184949B9C73F32BBC4703704DD72DC AT BL2PRD0410MB373 DOT namprd04 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> |
In-reply-to: | <AB5C244567184949B9C73F32BBC4703704DD72DC@BL2PRD0410MB373.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 9/12/2012 2:57 PM, Boemker, Tim wrote: > Larry, > > Do you mean that, with a POSIX path, I get ACL-based permissions, but > with Windows paths, I get just user-group-other permissions? Not quite. The POSIX path will give you the correct mapping of Windows ACLs into ugo plus any additional ACLS that don't map will show up with the '+' indicator. With Windows paths, you get simple, hard-coded, ugo, without any indication of further ACLs, if they exist. > That sounds reasonable, but shouldn't they agree as far as they overlap? > In the following example, for example, shouldn't they agree whether foo is > writable by Domain Users? No because with Windows paths Cygwin doesn't look at Windows ACLs. It just reports a default set of ugo permissions. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |