www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
X-Mail-Handler: | MailHop Outbound by DynDNS |
X-Report-Abuse-To: | abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) |
X-MHO-User: | U2FsdGVkX1+eclfDy1xkoDWB7PA7YqSc |
Date: | Mon, 28 May 2012 17:06:46 -0400 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Is the Latest Release of Cygwin supported on Windows Server 8/2012 |
Message-ID: | <20120528210646.GB27867@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C31348C437 AT xmb-sjc-233 DOT amer DOT cisco DOT com> <4FC169D9 DOT 6090107 AT tlinx DOT org> <4FC17A8A DOT 5050205 AT aol DOT com> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <4FC17A8A.5050205@aol.com> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
This discussion went off-topic quite some time ago. Please let this die. cgf On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 08:51:22PM -0400, Tim Prince wrote: >On 05/26/2012 07:40 PM, Linda Walsh wrote: >> >> >> Every time you fetch a word or instruction that is not 8-byte >> aligned, >> you force a fatal (but caught by the processor and/or OS) signal for >> unaligned >> data. That forces execution out of the pipeline (though not likely >> out of >> cache, sadly, due to frequency of occurrence). That's not counting >> the extra >> cycles to fetch the rest of the data. On some machines that can >> easily amount >> to several dozen instructions worth. >> >There have been compilers for 32-bit Windows for 20 years which gave >8-byte alignments by default. cygwin changed the default configure >parameter in binutils so as to support alignment about 8 years ago. It >was tolerable to some before then as it matters only for 64-bit and >larger objects (doubles, and SSE, after that was introduced). The >characteristics of the worst compiler (with respect to alignment) >available outside of cygwin don't have a bearing on this list. >If the powers that be have decided that 64-bit mode should be supported >on cygwin setup.exe only by mingw cross compilers, I'll accept that. > >-- >Tim Prince > > >-- >Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html >FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ >Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html >Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |