www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <20120413021811.GA19980@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
References: | <1581884843 DOT 20120412191907 AT mail DOT ru> <20120413021811 DOT GA19980 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> |
Date: | Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:39:50 +0200 |
Message-ID: | <CAEhDDbDGoB+gmkbYchPQSO+eTnOUTtN=6+wT8QCAuodqBDFRNg@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: Win2000 compatibility |
From: | Csaba Raduly <rcsaba AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q3D8eAnG001143 |
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 07:19:07PM +0400, iggor wrote: >>It appears that Cygwin SETUP.EXE at this time is uncompatible with >>Windows 2000, since it uses function GetModuleHandleExA which leads to >>error in searching entry point in kernel32.dll. So, I cannot run setup >>at all, even get help with option. AFAIK, this function is absent in >>all Win2k, not only my SP4, build 2195. > > I finally managed to check this on a virtual machine at home. At work I > could only check the sources and import list for setup.exe to see if > GetModuleHandleExA was referenced and I couldn't see any sign of it. > And, unsurprisingly, when I try setup.exe at home under W2K it does work > fine under Windows Service Pack 4. > > If you're having problems it seems like you either have an old version > of setup.exe or a non-Cygwin version of setup.exe. The following experiment appears to confirm that setup.exe has nothing to do with GetModuleHandleExA : $ strings ~/Cygwin/setup/setup.exe | grep GetModule GetModuleFileNameW GetModuleHandleA This is a setup.exe built from the CVS sources. The executable downloaded from cygwin.com is compressed, so: $ strings ~/download/setup-1.7.exe | grep GetModule (no output) Csaba -- GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++ The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers. Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts. "Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds "People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |