X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4F26FB6D.4050804@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:19:57 +0100
From:	marco atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: W7 and rebase [was "YA call for snapshot testing"]
References:	<0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A20A51C567A5 AT NIHMLBX02 DOT nih DOT gov>
In-Reply-To:	<0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A20A51C567A5@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 1/26/2012 1:07 PM, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
> marco atzeri sent the following at Friday, January 20, 2012 3:49 AM
>> my 2c$ : As rebaseall is almost mandatory on W7/64 and we are always
>> suggesting it to anyone with fork problem,
>
> My box was upgraded from XP Pro to W7 a couple of months ago.  At the
> beginning I was getting fork errors all the time when running scripts.
> It eventually went away (mostly*), though I don't remember whether it
> was as a result of something that knowingly did I did.
>
> (* It is now rare enough to not be a problem in practice.  I'll kill
> the script and start over.)
>
> The old guidance was that one shouldn't rebase unless one is told to.
> My question is whether that has changed.  Is it now, "rebase if you
> have W7"?

Hi Barry,
my guidance is rebasesall if you have fork errors.

My personal experience is that W7/64 is much more prone to
such issue than previous XP/32

>
> --------
>
> For the record, after the switch from XP to W7 I had another problem.
> I had the windows and system32 directories at the end of my path.  When
> running scripts, bash could sometimes miss /bin/sort and end up using
> Windows' sort.  It was intermittant and did not always happen at the
> same place in the script.  Bizzarre!

never seen such problem, but I am personally running only
cygwin snapshots in these days.

>
> I fixed it by taking windows and system32 out of my path.
>
> No action requested, but I thought I'd mention it as a datum in case
> it comes up again for someone else.
>
> - Barry

Regards
Marco



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -