| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
| X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| Message-ID: | <4EC2916B.9010400@cs.utoronto.ca> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:20:59 -0500 |
| From: | Ryan Johnson <ryan DOT johnson AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> |
| User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: [SOLVED] Re: What updates done after October 3 may affect gfortran built binaries? |
| References: | <1320840871 DOT 13045 DOT 51 DOT camel AT kare-desktop> <4EC28AE7 DOT 70600 AT gmail DOT com> |
| In-Reply-To: | <4EC28AE7.70600@gmail.com> |
| X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 15/11/2011 10:53 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 09/11/2011 12:15, Edvardsen KÃ¥re wrote:
>> This is again related to the failure of execution of a gfortran built
>> binary ("cannot execute binary", see thread
>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-11/msg00034.html )
>>
>> In short, the main problem is that I can't build a successful binary
>> from the FLEXPART fortran code
>
> I helped Edvardsen to track this down off-list. It turns out that FLEXPART
> is one of those huge number-crunching Fortran programs that's just jam-packed
> with ginormous multi-dimensional arrays. The final linked executable had 3.38
> GB of .bss space! So, it's not too surprising that it didn't load on 32-bit
> Windows; and it's not, as I was worrying, any explicit bug in the compiler or
> binutils (although it may be arguable that ld could be helpful if it issued
> some kind of warning in these circumstances).
Out of curiosity, how then was the OP ever able to make *any* version run?
Ryan
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |