www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F8rgen_Steensgaard?= <jsm AT steensgaard DOT org> |
Subject: | Re: Where to find a reliable provider of CygwinX? |
Date: | Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:34:15 +0100 |
Lines: | 23 |
Message-ID: | <iic4it$f7$1@dough.gmane.org> |
References: | <4D48169F DOT 3030607 AT steensgaard DOT org> <AANLkTi=bgxvGt3PyvxQ_0x5c3DPbogWLZ595z3o_Y5ih AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <ii9c7f$33r$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <4D48376C DOT 8070204 AT cygwin DOT com> <ii9ih4$9j9$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <20110201182757 DOT GA3139 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <ii9ssl$6bh$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <20110201214637 DOT GA6594 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
In-Reply-To: | <20110201214637.GA6594@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
I want to terminate this discussion, originating from my concern for=20 consistency among distribution providers. Originally I reported on a successful installation of basic Cygwin, i.e.=20 without X, followed by a failing attempt to install X. Of course I have=20 been aware all the way that X did not come with the basic installation,=20 and I have no idea of how to install X on top of it without using=20 setup.exe by Cygwin. Still I am asked to specify how I obtained the=20 packages for X, because they are not part of the basic installation. I see no reason to spend more time on this, the experience of which is=20 like being part of an absurd comedy, to say it mildly. I feel confident=20 that I can overcome the technical issues if I use the time on them instead. End of discussion. J=F8rgen -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |