X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:46:20 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: NetAPP / cygwin 1.7.7-1 avoid Recycle BIN dot files
Message-ID:	<20101117174620.GD11144@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20101117153803 DOT GB11144 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1PIkw2-1epSuu0 AT fwd05 DOT aul DOT t-online DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1PIkw2-1epSuu0@fwd05.aul.t-online.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Nov 17 17:32, koerner.sebastian wrote:
> Hello Corinna,
>  
>  Oh, btw.  In your OP you claimed that you have netapps for which Cygwin
>  returns "cifs" and other netapps for which Cygwin returns "vfat" as
>  filesystem.  The above one is clearly one of the "cifs" type.
>  
>  Here's the question: Do you *really* have some for which the latest
>  Cygwin 1.7.7 or the latest snapshot returns "vfat" and are they *really*
>  netapps?  In theory I'd expect that those are just remote FAT FS on some
>  remote Windows machine, and they shouldn't be affected by the reported
>  problem.
>  
> 
> I just checked and think I must have something mixed up.
> Under 1.7.7-1 both netapps are listed in "mount" as cifs and in getVolInfo as FAT with pretty much the same attribute set.

Pretty much is not the same.  Can you please send the getVolInfo output
for the other drive, too?

> If wonder: If this really is a netapp Bug - are you in contact with them?

I'm not a support customer and I don't have access to netapp drives
myself.  If some netapp customer is interested in having that fixed,
it would be most helpful if that customer would report the problem.
There's also the problem that a fix in newer netapps won't help users
of older ones, and in contrast to Samba we have no chance to find out
what netapp drive exactly we're talking to.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -