X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Yahoo-SMTP:	Uu383n6swBCEN1G9up0WSnxbvN8fCPmk
Message-ID:	<4CDC5D8E.7040107@cygwin.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:18:06 -0500
From:	"Larry Hall \(Cygwin\)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Installing new versions of vim doesn't uninstall old versions
References:	<0C33B811BB93B3469F549ADBFA84414718BC77B4B2 AT NALASEXMB08 DOT na DOT qualcomm DOT com> <4CDC342B DOT 7010308 AT cygwin DOT com> <ibhdkk$hi0$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <4CDC3CB5 DOT 4080300 AT cygwin DOT com> <20101111202901 DOT GB26142 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To:	<20101111202901.GB26142@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 11/11/2010 3:29 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:57:57PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> On 11/11/2010 1:45 PM, Ren?? Berber wrote:
>>> On 11/11/2010 12:21 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/11/2010 1:07 PM, Harrington, John wrote:
>>>>> I recently had a problem with vim that was the result of my unwittingly
>>>>> having two previous versions of vim in my /usr/bin.  Is it normal for the
>>>>> cygwin installer not to delete or clobber the previous versions?  I'm not
>>>>> sure what I did wrong, if anything, in updating my cygwin installation.
>>>>
>>>> Probably just a local glitch.  We haven't seen other reports of this,
>>>> though
>>>> that could just mean that no one else has noticed.
>>>
>>> Actually there are many reports, its not just vim, similar reports have
>>> been made about ssh, and checking for un-installed updates showed other
>>> cases.
>>>
>>> setup.exe just leaves<you-name-it>.exe.new (or .dll.new) and the change
>>> never happens.
>>>
>>> It may have been one of the old versions of setup, I don't know, some
>>> upgrades do happen correctly when an old one is still there, and left there.
>>
>> Yeah, maybe that explains this one too.  If John was using 'vim.exe' when he
>> did an update, then this could be the result.  But there is no vim-specific
>> issue here.
>
> And, of course, if anyone can provide a clearly-failing test case we'll fix
> the problem in setup.exe.

But this would make any existing work-arounds obsolete.  I think we need to
consider issues of backward bug compatibility before we blindly go fixing
'setup.exe'. ;-)

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -