X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<892554.5718.qm@web25507.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date:	Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:54:02 +0000 (GMT)
From:	Marco Atzeri <marco_atzeri AT yahoo DOT it>
Subject:	Re: Cygwin paths in mingw64
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, NightStrike <nightstrike AT gmail DOT com>
Cc:	LionAM <alemue7 AT hotmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<AANLkTinqk-wTz=Lj-kWz_udC0ueLeVGVhqUns2-UveJJ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

--- Ven 5/11/10, NightStrike <nightstrike AT gmail DOT com> ha scritto:

> > and Atlas is so deep unix related, that is better to
> use
>=20
> Does this imply that a direct mingw port is not feasible
> without
> extensive effort?
>=20

eventually with the mingw make but unlikely with the cygwin one.

Marco





--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -