X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_YG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	Michael Albinus <michael DOT albinus AT gmx DOT de>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: emacs-23.2-3 and DBus
References:	<844od1b8rx DOT fsf AT aol DOT com> <4CAB2230 DOT 4090500 AT cornell DOT edu> <877hhwiih3 DOT fsf AT gmx DOT de> <4CAB84CF DOT 2010604 AT cornell DOT edu> <8739skhs26 DOT fsf AT gmx DOT de> <4CAC73AF DOT 1020209 AT cornell DOT edu> <87ocb7mlhq DOT fsf AT gmx DOT de> <4CACB32F DOT 2070501 AT cornell DOT edu>
Date:	Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:51:24 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<4CACB32F.2070501@cornell.edu> (Ken Brown's message of "Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:34:39 -0400")
Message-ID:	<87y6abgqg3.fsf@gmx.de>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu> writes:

>> The binary has the following checksum:
>>
>> $ cksum /usr/bin/emacs
>> 658187514 16254990 /usr/bin/emacs
>
> That's not actually the binary; it's a symlink that resolves to either
> /usr/bin/emacs-X11.exe or /usr/bin/emacs-nox.exe, depending on whether
> or not you've installed the emacs-X11 package.  Is it possible that
> you upgraded the emacs package but are still using an old emacs-X11?
> If not, I don't know what the problem could be.  If you can't figure
> it out, you could try giving the command
>
>   cygcheck -svr > cygcheck.out
>
> and sending the resulting cygcheck.out as an attachment.  Maybe I (or
> someone) will be able to spot something.

I haven't the cygwin notebook with me, next access for me is tomorrow.
I'll check then.

The only difference I could imagine is that I haven't started the system
bus; only the session bus was running. Could you, please, check with
your environment? Maybe there is still a problem.

> Ken

Best regards, Michael.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -