Mail Archives: cygwin/2010/09/27/12:52:30
On 9/27/2010 10:31 AM, Heath Kehoe wrote:
> On 9/24/2010 2:54 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 01:23:48PM -0500, Heath Kehoe wrote:
>>> Well, another difference is the addition of PATH_MAX*2 bytes on the
>>> stack. Those functions do some stack manipulations that I'm having
>>> trouble grokking. Does 'ret' need to be topmost on the stack?
>>>
>>> As a test, I moved the 'ret' definition after that of 'dll_path' (in
>>> std_dll_init). So far with that change, I have not seen the LoadLibrary
>>> fatal error, though I need to test it more to be sure.
>> I've moved some other stuff around in that function. Could you try
>> the latest CVS?
>>
>> cgf
>>
> With your changes, I have not yet encountered any of the error 998
> failures, and I've run a couple of rebuilds of my project as a stress-test.
>
> Thanks,
> -h
Ugh! spoke too soon. It happened again:
1 [main] bash 5112! C:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal error -
could not load C:\Windows\system32\ws2_32.dll, Win32 error 998
Stack trace:
Frame Function Args
00288974 6102740B (00288974, 00000000, 00000000, 00000000)
00288C64 6102740B (61179C40, 00008000, 00000000, 6117B997)
00289C94 61004B2B (6117B084, 00289CB0, 00000000, 00000000)
00289EE4 6100136E (61053A2A, 00000154, 00000002, 00000002)
It's definitely a lot less frequent, though.
-h
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -